From: HighPoint Linux Team <linux@highpoint-tech.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][SCSI] hptiop: add more PCI device IDs
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:52:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <488ECC3D.9010502@highpoint-tech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080729003419.1b754608.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
At 2008/7/29 15:34, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:29:24 +0800 HighPoint Linux Team <linux@highpoint-tech.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Add PCI device ID for new adapter models.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: HighPoint Linux Team <linux@highpoint-tech.com>
>> ---
>>
>> drivers/scsi/hptiop.c | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff -purN linux-2.6.26-rc8/drivers/scsi/hptiop.c linux-2.6.26-rc8-hpt/drivers/scsi/hptiop.c
>> --- linux-2.6.26-rc8/drivers/scsi/hptiop.c 2008-06-25 09:58:20.000000000 +0800
>> +++ linux-2.6.26-rc8-hpt/drivers/scsi/hptiop.c 2008-07-24 15:09:50.000000000 +0800
>> @@ -1249,6 +1249,13 @@ static struct pci_device_id hptiop_id_ta
>> { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x3522), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_itl_ops },
>> { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x3410), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_itl_ops },
>> { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x3540), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_itl_ops },
>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x3530), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_itl_ops },
>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x3560), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_itl_ops },
>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x4322), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_itl_ops },
>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x4210), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_itl_ops },
>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x4211), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_itl_ops },
>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x4310), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_itl_ops },
>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x4311), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_itl_ops },
>> { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x3120), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_mv_ops },
>> { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x3122), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_mv_ops },
>> { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x3020), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_mv_ops },
>>
>
> I assume that this patch makes new devices work, whereas they do not
> work correctly in unpatched kernels, yes?
>
> If so, then this patch should be backported into 2.6.25.x and 2.6.26.x.
> Users of these kernels would presumably like their devices to work.
>
Yes, this patch should also be backported to 2.6.25.x and 2.6.26.x.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-29 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-25 5:29 [PATCH][SCSI] hptiop: add more PCI device IDs HighPoint Linux Team
2008-07-29 7:34 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-29 7:52 ` HighPoint Linux Team [this message]
2008-07-31 16:50 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2008-07-31 20:06 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=488ECC3D.9010502@highpoint-tech.com \
--to=linux@highpoint-tech.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.