From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m6U8XaBj028552 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:33:47 -0400 Received: from mail.uni-paderborn.de (mail.uni-paderborn.de [131.234.142.9]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6U82c3V006024 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:03:09 -0400 Message-ID: <48902011.7020609@hni.uni-paderborn.de> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:02:25 +0200 From: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Guennadi Liakhovetski References: <48030F6F.1040007@hni.uni-paderborn.de> <480477BD.5090900@hni.uni-paderborn.de> <481ADED1.8050201@hni.uni-paderborn.de> <481AF6CA.9030505@hni.uni-paderborn.de> <481AFB30.5070508@hni.uni-paderborn.de> <481B3D2F.80203@hni.uni-paderborn.de> <481F0BFA.7010306@hni.uni-paderborn.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: video4linux-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Some suggestions for the soc_camera interface List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: Guennadi Liakhovetski schrieb: > Hi Stefan, > > On Mon, 5 May 2008, Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote: > > >> Guennadi Liakhovetski schrieb: >> >>> So, I would say, patches 1 and 3 look useful to me. Please fix formatting >>> issues, add your Signed-off-by and submit in two separate emails. >>> >>> >> At the moment I update my system to the 2.6.25 kernel. When everything works >> fine, I submit the reworked >> patches the next days. >> > > How is this going? Do you have your patches ready? We have a few patches > brewing from sveral people, that touch the same code as yours, so, it > would be good to have your "move .power, .reset to camera-link" patch > applied, then we could move on with the others. > Sorry for the long delay. I’m waiting for some answer form OmniVision if I’m allowed to publish my current version of the OV9655 driver or whether something violent the NDA. Should I resend my "move .power, .reset to camera-link" patch without the driver or waiting until I can send my OV9655 driver? At the moment there is no driver which uses this. I have also implement some simple timeperframe configuration (vidioc_s_parm) via clock PLL and divider configuration in OV9655 driver, but only with a fix mclk_10khz of 2600. Regards Stefan -- Dipl.-Ing. Stefan Herbrechtsmeier Heinz Nixdorf Institute University of Paderborn System and Circuit Technology Fürstenallee 11 D-33102 Paderborn (Germany) office : F0.415 phone : + 49 5251 - 60 6342 fax : + 49 5251 - 60 6351 mailto : hbmeier@hni.upb.de www : http://wwwhni.upb.de/sct/mitarbeiter/hbmeier -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list