From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m6U8w2pU009031 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:58:03 -0400 Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6U8vonZ003314 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:57:51 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KO7VC-0002NA-AM for video4linux-list@redhat.com; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:57:46 +0000 Received: from 82-135-208-232.static.zebra.lt ([82.135.208.232]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:57:46 +0000 Received: from paulius.zaleckas by 82-135-208-232.static.zebra.lt with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:57:46 +0000 To: video4linux-list@redhat.com From: Paulius Zaleckas Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:57:35 +0300 Message-ID: <48902CFF.9020204@teltonika.lt> References: <48030F6F.1040007@hni.uni-paderborn.de> <480477BD.5090900@hni.uni-paderborn.de> <481ADED1.8050201@hni.uni-paderborn.de> <481AF6CA.9030505@hni.uni-paderborn.de> <481AFB30.5070508@hni.uni-paderborn.de> <481B3D2F.80203@hni.uni-paderborn.de> <481F0BFA.7010306@hni.uni-paderborn.de> <48902011.7020609@hni.uni-paderborn.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Some suggestions for the soc_camera interface List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote: > >> Guennadi Liakhovetski schrieb: >>> On Mon, 5 May 2008, Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote: >>> >>>> Guennadi Liakhovetski schrieb: >>>> >>>>> So, I would say, patches 1 and 3 look useful to me. Please fix >>>>> formatting >>>>> issues, add your Signed-off-by and submit in two separate emails. >>>>> >>>> At the moment I update my system to the 2.6.25 kernel. When everything >>>> works >>>> fine, I submit the reworked >>>> patches the next days. >>> How is this going? Do you have your patches ready? We have a few patches >>> brewing from sveral people, that touch the same code as yours, so, it would >>> be good to have your "move .power, .reset to camera-link" patch applied, >>> then we could move on with the others. >>> >> Sorry for the long delay. I’m waiting for some answer form OmniVision if I’m >> allowed to publish my current version of the OV9655 driver or whether >> something violent the NDA. > > Yes, this is an interesting question... > >> Should I resend my "move .power, .reset to camera-link" patch without the >> driver or waiting until I can send my OV9655 driver? At the moment there is no >> driver which uses this. > > I think, yes, it would be useful to move .reset and .power now, as I said, > I keep telling people "please keep in mind these fields are going to > move", so, we shall really finally move them:-) I am waiting for this also! Add me to the list :) Currently I have mclk parameter for camera host driver... And I have to set it frequently since I am playing with couple different sensors... >> I have also implement some simple timeperframe configuration (vidioc_s_parm) >> via clock PLL and divider configuration in OV9655 driver, but only with a fix >> mclk_10khz of 2600. > > Good! If this is ov9655-specific, let's wait until you're allowed to > submit your patch:-) > > Thanks > Guennadi > --- > Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. > Freelance Open-Source Software Developer > > -- > video4linux-list mailing list > Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list > -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list