From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <489033C8.6000105@domain.hid>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:26:32 +0200
From: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <487E1BE8.1000306@domain.hid>	
	<f5e14e470807200925h3ac5d321x1a6d7629dd03fb0e@domain.hid>	
	<488DD994.8020501@domain.hid> <488F2749.9010605@domain.hid>	
	<f5e14e470807291515j19e7d34v3b9a1579bc10377f@domain.hid>	
	<489026E5.1010801@domain.hid>
	<f5e14e470807300222q55dce280p4635265037d4350a@domain.hid>
In-Reply-To: <f5e14e470807300222q55dce280p4635265037d4350a@domain.hid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] Error propagating ISR to Linux domain
List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches,
	discussions\)" <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/xenomai-core>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
To: Ulrich Schwab <uli.schwab@domain.hid>
Cc: xenomai-core <xenomai@xenomai.org>

Ulrich Schwab wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Gilles Chanteperdrix
> <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org> wrote:
>> ...  you loose the RT response, as was (correctly) said in my first answer.
> You are right, of course.
> It was my error not to mention this in the original post.
> 
> For me this is just the solution to avoid the infinte loop when irqs are shared.
> Until now it was always possible to avoid shared irqs (between RT and non-RT)
> by changing the position of the PCI card.

It looks like some people can not avoid the shared IRQ between RT and
non RT. It is amazing that with APIC/IO-APIC PCs have something like 255
irqs, but that the PCs still manage to put several peripherals on the
same IRQ.

-- 
                                                 Gilles.