Re: [PATCH] Some suggestions for the soc_camera interface

[Stefan Herbrechtsmeier <hbmeier@hni.uni-paderborn.de>]

Paulius Zaleckas schrieb:
> Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>> Hi Stefan,
>>
>> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote:
>>
>>> Guennadi Liakhovetski schrieb:
>>>> On Mon, 5 May 2008, Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote:
>>>>  
>>>>> Guennadi Liakhovetski schrieb:
>>>>>    
>>>>>> So, I would say, patches 1 and 3 look useful to me. Please fix
>>>>>> formatting
>>>>>> issues, add your Signed-off-by and submit in two separate emails.
>>>>>>         
>>>>> At the moment I update my system to the 2.6.25 kernel. When 
>>>>> everything
>>>>> works
>>>>> fine, I submit the reworked
>>>>> patches the next days.
>>>> How is this going? Do you have your patches ready? We have a few 
>>>> patches
>>>> brewing from sveral people, that touch the same code as yours, so, 
>>>> it would
>>>> be good to have your "move .power, .reset to camera-link" patch 
>>>> applied,
>>>> then we could move on with the others.
>>>>   
>>> Sorry for the long delay. I’m waiting for some answer form 
>>> OmniVision if I’m
>>> allowed to publish my current version of the OV9655 driver or whether
>>> something violent the NDA.
>>
>> Yes, this is an interesting question...
>>
>>> Should I resend my "move .power, .reset to camera-link" patch 
>>> without the
>>> driver or waiting until I can send my OV9655 driver? At the moment 
>>> there is no
>>> driver which uses this.
>>
>> I think, yes, it would be useful to move .reset and .power now, as I 
>> said, I keep telling people "please keep in mind these fields are 
>> going to move", so, we shall really finally move them:-)
>
> I am waiting for this also! Add me to the list :)
> Currently I have mclk parameter for camera host driver... And I have to
> set it frequently since I am playing with couple different sensors...
My current version only touch the soc_camera files. Should I change the 
mt9m001 and mt9v022 sensor to use the new functions?
>
>
>>> I have also implement some simple timeperframe configuration 
>>> (vidioc_s_parm)
>>> via clock PLL and divider configuration in OV9655 driver, but only 
>>> with a fix
>>> mclk_10khz of 2600.
>>
>> Good! If this is ov9655-specific, let's wait until you're allowed to 
>> submit your patch:-)
>>
>> Thanks
>> Guennadi
>> ---
>> Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
>> Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
>>
>> -- 
>> video4linux-list mailing list
>> Unsubscribe 
>> mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list
>>

-- 
Dipl.-Ing. Stefan Herbrechtsmeier

Heinz Nixdorf Institute
University of Paderborn 
System and Circuit Technology 
Fürstenallee 11
D-33102 Paderborn (Germany)

office : F0.415
phone  : + 49 5251 - 60 6342
fax    : + 49 5251 - 60 6351

mailto : hbmeier@hni.upb.de

www    : http://wwwhni.upb.de/sct/mitarbeiter/hbmeier


--
video4linux-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list