From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andy Burns <lists.xensource.com@adslpipe.co.uk>
Subject: Re: State of Xen in upstream Linux
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:27:26 +0100
Message-ID: <4891695E.4040607@adslpipe.co.uk>
References: <48910C99.10606@goop.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <48910C99.10606@goop.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 31/07/2008 01:51, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:

> what's new with Xen.  

Thanks for the write-up (and the work itself!)

>     What's missing?  What do you depend on?  

I realise pv_ops dom0 should come first to save users' pain in that 
dept, currently I use pciback/front on 2.6.18 kernels, any idea when 
this might re-appear either in domU or dom0 pv_ops kernels?