From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: BVK Chaitanya <bayapuneni_chaitanya@symantec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serialize suspend-resume process
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:28:28 +0530
Message-ID: <4892A604.5070803@symantec.com>
References: <C4B797D3.24EF6%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
	<48929F9A.2050504@symantec.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <48929F9A.2050504@symantec.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

BVK Chaitanya wrote:
> Keir Fraser wrote:
>>
>> On 31/7/08 16:27, "BVK Chaitanya" <bayapuneni_chaitanya@symantec.com> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> It is doing a busy-wait loop till suspend-resume cycle completes, if
>>> any.  I found that it may go more than 25 msec sometimes.
>>
>> It's not a busy-wait loop. As long as shutdown_state does not change 
>> under
>> its feet, it will complete in no more than two iterations.
>>
> 
> Yep, my mistake :-(
> 

My mistake again, forget my last message.  It doesn't loose any suspend 
requests.


I should say its a nice piece of code; brain teasing after a long time :-)


regards,
--
bvk-chaitanya