From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: distclean failure Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:40:31 -0700 Message-ID: <489374BF.4010802@goop.org> References: <200808011614.56245.Christoph.Egger@amd.com> <20080801141820.GU4553@implementation.uk.xensource.com> <489371B1.1030600@goop.org> <20080801203642.GB4526@implementation> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080801203642.GB4526@implementation> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Samuel Thibault , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Christoph Egger , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Samuel Thibault wrote: > Jeremy Fitzhardinge, le Fri 01 Aug 2008 13:27:29 -0700, a =E9crit : > =20 >>> + [ ! -d libxc ] || $(MAKE) -C libxc clean >>> + [ ! -d ioemu ] || $(MAKE) -C ioemu clean >>> =20 >> Are you sure you don't not need a double negative there? >> =20 > > Mmm, why? The clean target succeeds if either there is not even > libxc/ioemu directories, or the make clean there works. > =20 I'm just pointing out that [ -d libxc ] && $(MAKE) -C libxc clean is more straightforward. J