From: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
To: "David Härdeman" <david@hardeman.nu>
Cc: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: Some questions regarding RedHat refpolicy patches
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:09:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <489737DD.6080103@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080803224448.GA22709@hardeman.nu>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
David Härdeman wrote:
> Going through the RedHat patches trying to find more stuff to send
> upstream for merge, I've come across a few things that I don't quite
> understand and I'd appreciate if someone could explain them to me :)
>
> a)
>
> There are quite a lot of changes like this:
>
> --- ./upstream/refpolicy/policy/modules/apps/uml.fc 2008-08-03
> 12:31:17.000000000 +0200
> +++ ./fedora/refpolicy/policy/modules/apps/uml.fc 2008-08-03
> 12:29:42.000000000 +0200
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> #
> # HOME_DIR/
> #
> -HOME_DIR/\.uml(/.*)?
> gen_context(system_u:object_r:ROLE_uml_rw_t,s0)
> +HOME_DIR/\.uml(/.*)?
> gen_context(system_u:object_r:user_uml_rw_t,s0)
>
These are the elimination of role separation on types in the homedir.
Upstream is experimenting with this and hopefully at some point we can
merge these changes together. I would figure in the final version user_
would be eliminated and it would just be uml_rw_t.
> What is the purpose of these changes and is it something that makes
> sense upstream? The upstream SVN version seems to contain quite a lot of
> "ROLE" contexts already...then again, other parts of the patch do the
> reverse:
>
> --- ./upstream/refpolicy/policy/modules/apps/mplayer.fc 2008-08-03
> 12:31:17.000000000 +0200
> +++ ./fedora/refpolicy/policy/modules/apps/mplayer.fc 2008-08-03
> 12:29:42.000000000 +0200
> @@ -10,4 +10,4 @@
> /usr/bin/mencoder --
> gen_context(system_u:object_r:mencoder_exec_t,s0)
> /usr/bin/xine --
> gen_context(system_u:object_r:mplayer_exec_t,s0)
>
> -HOME_DIR/\.mplayer(/.*)?
> gen_context(system_u:object_r:ROLE_mplayer_home_t,s0)
> +HOME_DIR/\.mplayer(/.*)?
> gen_context(system_u:object_r:user_mplayer_home_t,s0)
>
>
> b)
>
> There are also quite a lot of changes like this:
>
> --- ./upstream/refpolicy/policy/modules/apps/awstats.if 2008-08-03
> 12:31:17.000000000 +0200
> +++ ./fedora/refpolicy/policy/modules/apps/awstats.if 2008-05-15
> 15:10:34.000000000 +0200
> @@ -33,7 +33,8 @@
> #
> interface(`awstats_cgi_exec',`
> gen_require(`
> - type httpd_awstats_script_exec_t, httpd_awstats_content_t;
> + type httpd_awstats_script_exec_t;
> + type httpd_awstats_content_t;
>
> Are these only noise (and in that case, would you (Dan) like a patch to
> remove that noise) or something which is actually wanted upstream?
>
>
These are reforting by Chris that I missed. Chris wants these on the
same line, which I am fine with.
> c)
>
> A lot of changes only alter whitespace, would it be possible to avoid
> these by generating the fedora diff with the appropriate options to diff?
>
>
> d)
>
> Why does postgrey_t need to be able to restart apache? (and the same
> goes for many many other service module changes in the patch, such as
> canna, ldap, etc, etc)
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkiXN90ACgkQrlYvE4MpobMcAwCgrIUpI2GqFeuvl4Oeko9Tt1b2
jsQAoNjI2+X5cj0mrHHXapjp2O0XYnFI
=lcbF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-04 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-03 22:44 Some questions regarding RedHat refpolicy patches David Härdeman
2008-08-04 13:16 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2008-08-04 17:09 ` Daniel J Walsh [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=489737DD.6080103@redhat.com \
--to=dwalsh@redhat.com \
--cc=david@hardeman.nu \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.