From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1KQOcn-0004p2-NT for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:39:01 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQOcl-0004mL-CE for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:38:59 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQOcj-0004jn-Ou for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:38:58 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60927 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KQOcj-0004jb-HM for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:38:57 -0400 Received: from mta-out.inet.fi ([195.156.147.13]:53158 helo=jenni2.inet.fi) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KQOcj-000263-5B for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:38:57 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (88.193.32.97) by jenni2.inet.fi (8.5.014) id 489066C5003B50AB for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 18:38:55 +0300 Message-ID: <48987410.3030005@nic.fi> Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 18:38:56 +0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Vesa_J=E4=E4skel=E4inen?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <414717.45608.qm@web31604.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20080725081827.42534c83@gibibit.com> <87ljzbg2yb.fsf@xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <87ljzbg2yb.fsf@xs4all.nl> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Subject: Re: Remove conf/*.mk from svn X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 15:38:59 -0000 Marco Gerards wrote: > Colin D Bennett writes: >> I think we should remove conf/*.mk from the Subversion repository. If >> people are going to be developing on GRUB and checking out svn >> branches, then I think it's fine to require them to have Ruby. For >> released tarballs that we expect non-developers to use, we just need t= o >> generate the *.mk files and include them in the tarball. >=20 > I do not have problems with this. Besides this, it will stop people > from sending in patches with .mk changes in it :-) I think Okuji's objection is based on fact that it makes it harder for=20 people to compile from sources. Now what if we would generate those=20 files when making a release? Of course this should be enabled to=20 script/makefile to make it automatically so it is not forgotten ;) Thanks, Vesa J=E4=E4skel=E4inen