From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 8] x86/smp function calls: convert x86 tlb flushes to use function calls
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 20:33:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48991B84.2080704@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k5eu6d4f.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Andi Kleen wrote:
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> writes:
>
>
>> 1. use smp_call_function_mask to implement cross-cpu TLB flushes
>>
>
>
> Do you have any measurements comparing performance of the old and
> the new call? TLB flush is quite time critical so we should be very
> careful here.
No. What benchmark would you suggest?
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-06 3:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-02 0:14 [PATCH 0 of 8] x86/smp function calls: convert x86 tlb flushes to use function calls Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-02 0:14 ` [PATCH 1 of 8] x86-32: use smp_call_function_mask for SMP TLB invalidations Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-02 0:14 ` [PATCH 2 of 8] x86-64: " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-02 0:14 ` [PATCH 3 of 8] x86: make tlb_32|64 closer Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-02 0:14 ` [PATCH 4 of 8] x86: unify tlb.c Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-02 0:14 ` [PATCH 5 of 8] smp_function_call: add multiple queues for scalability Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-02 0:14 ` [PATCH 6 of 8] x86: add multiple smp_call_function queues Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-02 0:14 ` [PATCH 7 of 8] x86: make number of smp_call_function queues truely configurable Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-02 0:14 ` [PATCH 8 of 8] smp function calls: add kernel parameter to disable multiple queues Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-06 3:22 ` [PATCH 0 of 8] x86/smp function calls: convert x86 tlb flushes to use function calls Andi Kleen
2008-08-06 3:33 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2008-08-06 3:37 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-11 23:57 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48991B84.2080704@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.