All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartlomiej Sieka <tur@semihalf.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3] ppc: Report back the location we put the device tree if we dont boot
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:21:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48995F0F.8070807@semihalf.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080806070841.480A624847@gemini.denx.de>

Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <1218004332-20311-1-git-send-email-galak@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote:
>> Its useful to know where the device tree is if we have set 'autostart'
>> to 'no.  We come back to the prompt after a boot command and we can
>> than post process the device tree but we need to know where it was put
>> report this back via the env variable 'bootm_fdtaddr'.
> 
> NAK.
> 
> The whole code sequence in bootm.c seems broken to me:
> 
> 272         debug ("## Transferring control to Linux (at address %08lx) ...\n",
> 273                 (ulong)kernel);
> 274
> 275         show_boot_progress (15);
> 276
> 277 #if defined(CFG_INIT_RAM_LOCK) && !defined(CONFIG_E500)
> 278         unlock_ram_in_cache();
> 279 #endif
> 280         if (!images->autostart)
> 281                 return ;
> 282
> 283 #if defined(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT)
> 
> 
> The debug() [272f] should come immediately before booting the kernel
> (i. e. move below line 282) because it is supposed to show when we
> branch to Linux. No other code should be inbetween.
> 
> And the (!images->autostart) test makes absolutely no sense here.
> Documentation says:
> 
> 	autostart: if set to "yes", an image loaded using the rarpb,
> 	bootp, dhcp, tftp, disk, or docb commands will be
> 	automatically started (by internally calling the bootm
> 	command).
> 

Hi Wolfgang,

The test you're referring to was introduced by commit
75fa002c47171b73fb4c1f2c2fe4d6391c136276 "[new uImage] Respect autostart
setting in linux bootm" by Kumar -- he should be better able to explain
the details.


> The "autostart" field introduced with the new image stuff behaves very
> different, and actually makes no sense to me at all.
> 
> Bartek, could you please comment what the intended behaviour was, and
> how it relates to the documentated behaviour?

It looks like that the "autostart" field has been added to the
bootm_headers structure so that the arch-specific code can make
decisions about booting without the need to call getenv("autostart").
Instead, the "autostart" field is set based on the env. variable once,
and passed to boot-related functions via a parameter (e.g., "images" in
do_bootm_linux()).

Again, this field has beed introduced by Kumar
(f5614e7926863bf0225ec860d9b319741a9c4004, "[new uImage] Add autostart
flag to bootm_headers structure"), who should be able to comment more.

Regards,
Bartlomiej

  reply	other threads:[~2008-08-06  8:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-06  6:32 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3] ppc: Report back the location we put the device tree if we dont boot Kumar Gala
2008-08-06  6:32 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/3] Add ePAPR boot command Kumar Gala
2008-08-06  6:32   ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/3] add ability to disable ft_board_setup as part of bootm Kumar Gala
2008-08-11 21:56     ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-08-06  8:21   ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/3] Add ePAPR boot command Wolfgang Denk
2008-08-06 13:03     ` Kumar Gala
2008-08-06 14:40       ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-08-06  7:08 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3] ppc: Report back the location we put the device tree if we dont boot Wolfgang Denk
2008-08-06  8:21   ` Bartlomiej Sieka [this message]
2008-08-06  8:33     ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-08-06 13:16       ` Kumar Gala
2008-08-06 14:46         ` Wolfgang Denk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48995F0F.8070807@semihalf.com \
    --to=tur@semihalf.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.