From: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>
To: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Tigran Aivazian <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/5] x86-microcode: run ucode update via workqueue
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:35:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <489A0AFB.1030701@qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b647ffbd0808061314n3bbe3396ncf0844cceb2576ac@mail.gmail.com>
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
>> Rebased Dmitry's patch set to x86-microcode and incorporated changes into AMD microcode patch loader. No issues with
>> cpu-hotplug anymore, tested on Intel as well as AMD.
>
> btw., I still think we should consider running ucode-updates from the
> low-level arch code. But as it's perhaps a material for .28, there
> should be plenty of time.
That'd be ok. Somehow I think it's not worth the effort though. If the
machine was able to boot to the point that it can run user-space
(request_firmware) with the old microcode it can probably sustain itself
a bit longer while waiting for the workqueue thread to be scheduled.
You probably have more exciting things to do ;-)
The latest patches look ok btw.
Max
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-06 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-06 15:21 [patch 0/5] x86-microcode: run ucode update via workqueue Peter Oruba
2008-08-06 15:21 ` [patch 1/5] [PATCH 1/5] x86: microcode generic updates Peter Oruba
2008-08-11 19:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-06 15:21 ` [patch 2/5] [PATCH 2/5] x86: Minor correction to header file Peter Oruba
2008-08-11 19:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-06 15:21 ` [patch 3/5] [PATCH 3/5] x86: Run Intel ucode-updates via workqueue Peter Oruba
2008-08-06 15:44 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-06 15:56 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-08-06 15:57 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-08-06 20:31 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-08-06 20:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-11 19:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-06 15:21 ` [patch 4/5] [PATCH 4/5] x86: Minor correction to Intel microcode patch loader Peter Oruba
2008-08-11 19:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-12 14:14 ` Peter Oruba
2008-08-06 15:21 ` [patch 5/5] [PATCH 5/5] x86: Run AMD microcode updates via workqueue Peter Oruba
2008-08-06 20:14 ` [patch 0/5] x86-microcode: run ucode update " Dmitry Adamushko
2008-08-06 20:35 ` Max Krasnyansky [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=489A0AFB.1030701@qualcomm.com \
--to=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peter.oruba@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.