From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: State of Xen in upstream Linux Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:24:22 -0700 Message-ID: <48A1B936.6090806@goop.org> References: <48910C99.10606@goop.org> <20080812111401.GG3771@edu.joroinen.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080812111401.GG3771@edu.joroinen.fi> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Pasi_K=E4rkk=E4inen?= Cc: Xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen wrote: > Are you planning to start with redhat's dom0-pvops work?=20 > > http://git.et.redhat.com/?p=3Dlinux-2.6-dom0-pvops.git;a=3Dsummary > > It hasn't been updated for a while, but I guess it should be working to= some > extend..=20 > =20 Yes, that's the plan. Stephen Tweedie has a half-completed rebase to=20 bring it somewhat up to date, and I'm hoping to use that as the base for=20 further work. J