From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update pom-ng docs for new iptables snapshots Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:50:10 +0200 Message-ID: <48A2D882.20908@trash.net> References: <20080802234156.GA26595@linuxace.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Phil Oester , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:41468 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752729AbYHMMuM (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Aug 2008 08:50:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Saturday 2008-08-02 19:41, Phil Oester wrote: > >> Attempting to run pom-ng's runme against an iptables snapshot >> which has not yet had release.sh run in it will fail. Update >> docs to reflect this. >> >> This closes bugzilla #538. > > I'd rather address it by stating its seemingly obsoletedness that > has been discussed in previous threads. > In other words, `svn rm * && svn commit`, and keep the repository > for history. We can do that, but for now I would prefer this patch since I don't have the time for checking whether we still want anything. The patch doesn't apply cleanly though: patching file README Hunk #1 FAILED at 2. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file README.rej Not sure what the problem is ...