From: Marcos E. Matsunaga <Marcos.Matsunaga@oracle.com>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Dynamic local alloc (halfway there)
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:47:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48A34865.1020003@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080813195248.GN21187@wotan.suse.de>
Overall, it runs faster.. a 10 cycle test would take a whole weekend and
not finish. I ran a complete 30+cycles over the weekend.
Regards,
Marcos Eduardo Matsunaga
Oracle USA
Linux Engineering
?The statements and opinions expressed here are my own and do not
necessarily represent those of Oracle Corporation.?
Mark Fasheh wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 03:10:33PM -0400, Marcos E. Matsunaga wrote:
>
>> The times in average goes up 3-4 times and then comes back to normal. I had
>> some hard times with the kernel because at some point it starts to dump stacks
>> for processes that stay too long without responding. Some of the systems had
>> times over 3-4 times going up to about 10 times, but my guess is that it was
>> related to the dumps as the systems get very slow at that point.
>>
>
> Ok, so we're doing much better - where it would slow down by about 50 times
> before. How about overall run time? Is that affected at all? Do we complete
> the whole test faster than before, or does the run time stay the same?
>
>
>
>> I'm planning to leave it running again, but disabling the dumps. I'm not really
>> sure it will have much of an effect in terms of performance impact, but I'll
>> try.
>>
>
> Well, it's certainly worth knowing :)
> --Mark
>
> --
> Mark Fasheh
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/attachments/20080813/ce7c3703/attachment.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-13 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-31 20:41 [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Dynamic local alloc (halfway there) Mark Fasheh
2008-07-31 20:42 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 1/3] ocfs2: Track local alloc bits internally Mark Fasheh
2008-07-31 21:16 ` Joel Becker
2008-07-31 20:42 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 2/3] ocfs2: throttle back local alloc when low on disk space Mark Fasheh
2008-07-31 21:11 ` Joel Becker
2008-07-31 20:42 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 3/3] ocfs2: track local alloc state via debugfs Mark Fasheh
2008-07-31 21:16 ` Joel Becker
2008-08-13 19:10 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Dynamic local alloc (halfway there) Marcos E. Matsunaga
2008-08-13 19:52 ` Mark Fasheh
2008-08-13 20:47 ` Marcos E. Matsunaga [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48A34865.1020003@oracle.com \
--to=marcos.matsunaga@oracle.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.