From: Yang Hongyang <yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: vladislav.yasevich@hp.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6:fix the return interface index when get it while no message is received
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:28:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48AA6800.1020506@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080818.223857.125980599.davem@davemloft.net>
David Miller wrote:
> From: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
> Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:31:07 -0400
>
>> I don't think that's correct at all. The code path shows here is
>> when there are no received options and no sticky options set. In
>> such case, we shouldn't be returning multicast or bound interfaces.
>> We should be returning 0.
I use setsockopt() to set the bounded interface of the socket, and
then I get receiving interface index while no message is received through
the above socket,shoudn't the bounded interface be returned?
>>
>> Additionally the address returned is completely bogus as well. We
>> are returning the address our peer instead of the one of our own
>> addresses.
If message is received,the address returned is what the received
message refered to, otherwise the address returned is what I used setsockopt()
to set before.
>
> Yang, please fix this up, thank you.
>
>
Seems that I misunderstood the RFC?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-19 6:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-18 6:07 [PATCH] IPv6:fix the return interface index when get it while no message is received Yang Hongyang
2008-08-18 6:22 ` David Miller
2008-08-18 13:31 ` Vlad Yasevich
2008-08-19 5:38 ` David Miller
2008-08-19 6:28 ` Yang Hongyang [this message]
2008-08-19 13:36 ` Vlad Yasevich
2008-08-20 2:56 ` Yang Hongyang
2008-08-20 13:10 ` Vlad Yasevich
2008-08-22 11:54 ` David Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-08-08 4:27 get receiving interface index " Yang Hongyang
2008-08-08 5:59 ` [PATCH] IPv6:fix the return interface index when get it " Yang Hongyang
2008-08-08 6:03 ` David Miller
2008-08-08 14:58 ` Vlad Yasevich
2008-08-18 5:41 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48AA6800.1020506@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vladislav.yasevich@hp.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.