From: "Tony.Ho" <iptables@iblink.com.cn>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: libxt_recent: do not allow both --set and --rttl
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 01:10:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48AC5002.2070401@iblink.com.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0808031503320.6502@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
+ if ((flags & IPT_RECENT_TTL) &&
+ (flags & (IPT_RECENT_SET | IPT_RECENT_REMOVE | IPT_RECENT_UPDATE)))
I think there should be:
+ if ((flags & IPT_RECENT_TTL) &&
+ (flags & (IPT_RECENT_SET | IPT_RECENT_REMOVE)))
Is it rhght?
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> commit a49a4695616dd8c467360af5447869e3a68c4f4d
> Author: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
> Date: Sun Aug 3 15:03:27 2008 -0400
>
> libxt_recent: do not allow both --set and --rttl
>
> Reported-by: Erich Schubert <erich@debian.org>
> Reference: Debian bug #346034
>
> "I was using the --rttl option in my --set line; this caused all
> incoming ssh connections to be rejected; --rttl is only to be used
> with --rcheck and --update."
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
> ---
> extensions/libipt_recent.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/extensions/libipt_recent.c b/extensions/libipt_recent.c
> index 51b0d15..108de2f 100644
> --- a/extensions/libipt_recent.c
> +++ b/extensions/libipt_recent.c
> @@ -75,6 +75,10 @@ static void recent_init(struct xt_entry_match *match)
> info->side = IPT_RECENT_SOURCE;
> }
>
> +#define RECENT_CMDS \
> + (IPT_RECENT_SET | IPT_RECENT_CHECK | \
> + IPT_RECENT_UPDATE | IPT_RECENT_REMOVE)
> +
> /* Function which parses command options; returns true if it
> ate an option */
> static int recent_parse(int c, char **argv, int invert, unsigned int *flags,
> @@ -83,43 +87,47 @@ static int recent_parse(int c, char **argv, int invert, unsigned int *flags,
> struct ipt_recent_info *info = (struct ipt_recent_info *)(*match)->data;
> switch (c) {
> case 201:
> - if (*flags) exit_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM,
> + if (*flags & RECENT_CMDS)
> + exit_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM,
> "recent: only one of `--set', `--rcheck' "
> "`--update' or `--remove' may be set");
> check_inverse(optarg, &invert, &optind, 0);
> info->check_set |= IPT_RECENT_SET;
> if (invert) info->invert = 1;
> - *flags = 1;
> + *flags |= IPT_RECENT_SET;
> break;
>
> case 202:
> - if (*flags) exit_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM,
> + if (*flags & RECENT_CMDS)
> + exit_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM,
> "recent: only one of `--set', `--rcheck' "
> "`--update' or `--remove' may be set");
> check_inverse(optarg, &invert, &optind, 0);
> info->check_set |= IPT_RECENT_CHECK;
> if(invert) info->invert = 1;
> - *flags = 1;
> + *flags |= IPT_RECENT_CHECK;
> break;
>
> case 203:
> - if (*flags) exit_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM,
> + if (*flags & RECENT_CMDS)
> + exit_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM,
> "recent: only one of `--set', `--rcheck' "
> "`--update' or `--remove' may be set");
> check_inverse(optarg, &invert, &optind, 0);
> info->check_set |= IPT_RECENT_UPDATE;
> if (invert) info->invert = 1;
> - *flags = 1;
> + *flags |= IPT_RECENT_UPDATE;
> break;
>
> case 206:
> - if (*flags) exit_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM,
> + if (*flags & RECENT_CMDS)
> + exit_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM,
> "recent: only one of `--set', `--rcheck' "
> "`--update' or `--remove' may be set");
> check_inverse(optarg, &invert, &optind, 0);
> info->check_set |= IPT_RECENT_REMOVE;
> if (invert) info->invert = 1;
> - *flags = 1;
> + *flags |= IPT_RECENT_REMOVE;
> break;
>
> case 204:
> @@ -132,6 +140,7 @@ static int recent_parse(int c, char **argv, int invert, unsigned int *flags,
>
> case 207:
> info->check_set |= IPT_RECENT_TTL;
> + *flags |= IPT_RECENT_TTL;
> break;
>
> case 208:
> @@ -157,11 +166,15 @@ static int recent_parse(int c, char **argv, int invert, unsigned int *flags,
> /* Final check; must have specified a specific option. */
> static void recent_check(unsigned int flags)
> {
> -
> - if (!flags)
> + if (!(flags & RECENT_CMDS))
> exit_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM,
> "recent: you must specify one of `--set', `--rcheck' "
> "`--update' or `--remove'");
> + if ((flags & IPT_RECENT_TTL) &&
> + (flags & (IPT_RECENT_SET | IPT_RECENT_REMOVE | IPT_RECENT_UPDATE)))
> + exit_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM,
> + "recent: --rttl may only be used with --rcheck or "
> + "--update");
> }
>
> /* Prints out the matchinfo. */
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-20 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-03 19:04 libxt_recent: do not allow both --set and --rttl Jan Engelhardt
2008-08-04 10:52 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-08-20 17:10 ` Tony.Ho [this message]
2008-08-20 17:49 ` libxt_recent: do allow --rttl for --update Jan Engelhardt
2008-09-01 12:28 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48AC5002.2070401@iblink.com.cn \
--to=iptables@iblink.com.cn \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.