From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <48AEAB01.9050505@domain.hid>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:03:13 +0200
From: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <985677.92816.qm@domain.hid>
In-Reply-To: <985677.92816.qm@domain.hid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] ARM926EJ-S and Xenomai
List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai
	<xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help>,
	<mailto:xenomai-help-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/xenomai-help>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-help-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help>,
	<mailto:xenomai-help-request@domain.hid>
To: stan.bred@domain.hid
Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org

Stankiewicz Bredkjaer wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> thanks for the quick answer. I think, I will follow your advice and
> first move to a vanilla Kernel and see how i can easily port the
> drivers if needed.

I think it is the best thing to do, really. If we admit that the
montavista people did actually improve performance of the 2.6.10 kernel,
everybody will agree, even montavista, and tell you that the performance
improvements of a recent kernel are superior.

-- 
                                                 Gilles.