From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <48AEE945.8000503@domain.hid>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:28:53 +0200
From: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <48AEE3AB.6070001@domain.hid>
In-Reply-To: <48AEE3AB.6070001@domain.hid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH 2/2] Unify asm-x86/atomic.h
Reply-To: gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org
List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches,
	discussions\)" <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/xenomai-core>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
Cc: Xenomai-core@domain.hid

Jan Kiszka wrote:
> ...and also automatically fixes the missing LOCK prefix for
> pthread_mutex_* services on x86_32 SMP.

This looks to me as a half-way unification. Can we not totally get rid
of atomic_32.h and atomic_64.h ? I mean since we are using unsigned long
as atomic_t on both platforms, there should not be much difference
(except maybe the inline asm).

-- 
                                                 Gilles.