From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2008-discuss] Kernel Summit Request for Discussion: The Future of Target mode and Cloud storage on Linux Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 23:01:51 +0400 Message-ID: <48AF0D1F.5030605@vlnb.net> References: <48ADC53B.6090501@vlnb.net> <20080822081958A.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-relay-03.mailcluster.net ([77.221.130.215]:55826 "EHLO mail-relay-01.mailcluster.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752201AbYHVTBZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:01:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080822081958A.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: FUJITA Tomonori Cc: ksummit-2008-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, bart.vanassche@gmail.com, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, scst-devel@lists.sourceforge.net FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:42:51 +0400 > Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote: > >>> Hmm, really? STGT development is more active IET. >> Tomo-san, be honest. It was *you*, who stopped the IET development, >> forcing people to switch to STGT. There is no point to prepare patches >> for IET, if they will never get merged. > > I stopped working on IET but it doesn't mean that I force others to > stop working on IET. Arne said that he merges patches. Well, how about declaring unlimited code freeze for all core parts? Has anybody, except you, had a right to merge patches to IET? Which %% of coming non-trivial patches have you merged in the last few years? Near zero? For instance, how many not too bad patches from Ross S. W. Walker were silently ignored? He didn't received even small comments, which made him so frustrated, so he stopped all the development activities? Vlad