From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:24:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48AFD764.7010605@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080823071014.GT23334@one.firstfloor.org>
Andi Kleen wrote:
>> Exactly. Don't rebase. And don't base your development on somebody who
>> does.
>
> That's pretty much impossible in the current state of Linux development
> as far as I know.
>
>> Remember how I told you that you should never rebase?
>
> I suspect your recommendation does not match real world git use.
I think if you have to rebase often, you're actually better off using
stgit (patch queues is what the mercurial folks use instead of
often-rebased local branches).
Disclaimer: I am not an stgit user myself.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-23 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-22 17:46 nicer frontend to get rebased tree? Andi Kleen
2008-08-22 17:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-22 18:27 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-22 19:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-22 20:11 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2008-08-22 20:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-22 20:36 ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-08-22 20:46 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2008-08-22 20:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-22 21:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-23 7:10 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-23 9:24 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2008-08-23 16:36 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-23 23:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-08-23 15:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-23 16:45 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-23 17:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-25 9:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-23 18:18 ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-08-23 18:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-23 20:08 ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-08-23 21:38 ` Documentating branches (was: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?) Marius Vollmer
2008-08-23 22:17 ` Miklos Vajna
2008-08-23 22:30 ` Documenting branches Marius Vollmer
2008-08-23 22:18 ` Documentating branches Marius Vollmer
2008-08-22 17:56 ` nicer frontend to get rebased tree? Avery Pennarun
2008-08-22 18:31 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-22 19:03 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2008-08-22 19:34 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-08-23 7:15 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-23 8:52 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2008-08-23 9:21 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-08-23 16:53 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-23 21:04 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2008-08-23 21:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-23 22:09 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2008-08-23 22:13 ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-08-24 0:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-23 22:49 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-08-23 23:01 ` Theodore Tso
2008-08-23 23:01 ` A proposed solution (Was: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?) Theodore Tso
2008-08-22 20:11 ` nicer frontend to get rebased tree? Mikael Magnusson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48AFD764.7010605@gnu.org \
--to=bonzini@gnu.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.