From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <48B266B9.50100@domain.hid>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:00:57 +0200
From: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <48AEE3AB.6070001@domain.hid>
	<48AEE945.8000503@domain.hid>	<48AFCD61.8040203@domain.hid>
	<48AFE515.70003@domain.hid> <48AFEA3B.4070702@domain.hid>
	<48B265A4.5040003@domain.hid>
In-Reply-To: <48B265A4.5040003@domain.hid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH 2/2] Unify asm-x86/atomic.h
List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches,
	discussions\)" <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/xenomai-core>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
Cc: Xenomai-core@domain.hid

Jan Kiszka wrote:
> +#include <asm/atomic.h>
> +
> +#if BITS_PER_LONG != 32
> +#error Upgrade to kernel 2.6!
> +#endif

I am not well versed with the 2.4 support. But are we sure we support no
64 bits architecture with 2.4 ? What about ppc64 ?

-- 
                                                 Gilles.