Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH 0/6] Registry-related cleanups and improvements

[Philippe Gerum <rpm@xenomai.org>]

Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Here comes the complete series of patches to improve the Xenomai
>> registry. #1, #5, and #6 are resends of already posted patches, the
>> middle part is fresh from the editor. The series reduces overhead
>> and simplifies the registry code. Overall diffstat:
>>
>>  include/asm-generic/hal.h  |   10 +-
>>  include/nucleus/registry.h |   10 --
>>  ksrc/arch/generic/hal.c    |   18 +--
>>  ksrc/arch/generic/nmi.c    |    6 -
>>  ksrc/arch/x86/nmi_32.c     |    6 -
>>  ksrc/nucleus/module.c      |   58 ++++-------
>>  ksrc/nucleus/registry.c    |  223 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>>  ksrc/skins/native/alarm.c  |   22 +---
>>  ksrc/skins/native/buffer.c |   15 ---
>>  ksrc/skins/native/cond.c   |   14 --
>>  ksrc/skins/native/event.c  |   15 ---
>>  ksrc/skins/native/heap.c   |   14 --
>>  ksrc/skins/native/intr.c   |   17 ---
>>  ksrc/skins/native/mutex.c  |   15 ---
>>  ksrc/skins/native/pipe.c   |   14 --
>>  ksrc/skins/native/queue.c  |   12 --
>>  ksrc/skins/native/sem.c    |   14 --
>>  ksrc/skins/native/task.c   |   16 ---
>>  18 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 317 deletions(-)
>>
>> So a net gain of more than 130 LOC.
>>
>> The series passed basic tests on my virtual target.
> 
> Ok. Now that we have discussed the potential xnsynch issue, the patches
> are Ok for me.
> 

Ok, I'll merge then.

-- 
Philippe.