From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sHittmeyer Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:11:43 +0200 Subject: [ath9k-devel] Poor performance on AR5418 In-Reply-To: <14d615330808261602t775294d0q51c954071950fdfd@mail.gmail.com> References: <14d615330808261509rf0130e1h5c092e7846b29bbc@mail.gmail.com> <43e72e890808261523ud3f82d6gaaf944df670d80d3@mail.gmail.com> <14d615330808261547l5ea24ffcs4dd7234133ea1cfd@mail.gmail.com> <20080826230132.GE9211@tesla> <14d615330808261602t775294d0q51c954071950fdfd@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <48B4F01F.4000609@corscience.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org Jeremy Apthorp schrieb: > 2008/8/27 Luis R. Rodriguez : > >> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 03:47:05PM -0700, Jeremy Apthorp wrote: >> >>> 2008/8/27 Luis R. Rodriguez : >>> >>>> Link quality is not 100% correct, its actually better. We need to add >>>> noise floor calibration to get it to report more accurate values. So >>>> for now just use it as a guide. Also the rate reported by iwconfig is >>>> not correct, please rely on iperf for proper performance tests. >>>> >>> I was more concerned about the packet loss than the link quality or >>> the reported rate. Also, I tried loading google.com in a browser, and >>> it took several minutes. >>> >> How soon after associating and getting an IP and pinging do you get >> packet loss? Whatever it is we definitely will need to fix it. >> > > Directly. I didn't at any point get a good link. > _______________________________________________ > ath9k-devel mailing list > ath9k-devel at lists.ath9k.org > https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel > > > I'm using an ordinary Desktop-PC with Kubuntu and an selfbuilded Kernel-2.6.26.2 / Kernel-2.6.26.rc3. with both Kernels I tried the Ath9k using a D-Link DWA-547 (AR5416 inside). I simply have the same lossrate of up to over 50% while connecting to a 11g network. So unfortunately it doesn't seam to be just a problem of AR5418. -stefan-