From: Claudio Scordino <claudio@evidence.eu.com>
To: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Cc: lg@denx.de, rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
marc.pignat@hevs.ch
Subject: Re: [ARM] Regression ? at91rm9200 machine-type
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:09:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48B527F6.6040705@evidence.eu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080826131736.GA1916@fluff.org.uk>
Ben Dooks ha scritto:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:30:01PM +0200, Claudio Scordino wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a custom board equivalent to AT91RM9200DK.
>
> Is that exactly the same, or does it have changes?
No, it's really equivalent, that's why I used the same configuration.
>
> Note, this should have been sent to the linux-arm-kernel list, where
> it will be read by more of the developers who work on ARM, we don't
> all have time to sit on linux-kernel.
I see. I thought the right place for this kind of question was the
LKML. I will use linux-arm-kernel for future issues about Linux on ARM.
Anyway, eventually I found out that this is a bug of U-Boot (see
later) and not of Linux.
>
>> After commit
>>
>> 87fee013a23ad02821699aef5b76891b42959182
>>
>> [ARM] 4647/1: at91rm9200: Remove redundant machine-type verification
>> and manipulation
>>
>> I cannot boot my board anymore.
>
> Hmm, having looked at this, it would be very probably that your
> u-boot is not passing the right boot information to the kernel.
Right. U-Boot does not pass the right value when compiled for the
AT91RM9200DK board... I'm going to send an email to the U-Boot ML to
fix this bug.
Many thanks to all,
Claudio
--
Ing. Claudio Scordino
Software Engineer, PhD
Tel. +39-050-5492050
http://retis.sssup.it/~scordino/
Evidence Srl
Embedded Real-Time Solutions
http://www.evidence.eu.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-27 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-26 10:30 [ARM] Regression ? at91rm9200 machine-type Claudio Scordino
2008-08-26 12:43 ` Marc Pignat
2008-08-26 13:19 ` Russell King
2008-08-27 10:09 ` Claudio Scordino
2008-08-26 13:17 ` Ben Dooks
2008-08-27 10:09 ` Claudio Scordino [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48B527F6.6040705@evidence.eu.com \
--to=claudio@evidence.eu.com \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=lg@denx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.pignat@hevs.ch \
--cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.