Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC][PATCH 2/3] Switch to handle-based fast mutex owners

[Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>]

Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> +	xnarch_atomic_set(mutex->owner,
>> +		 	  set_claimed(xnthread_handle(owner),
>> +				      xnsynch_nsleepers(&mutex->synchbase)));
> 
> Ok. I think you have spotted a bug here. This should be mutex->sleepers
> instead of xnsynch_nsleepers.

BTW, why do you need to track sleepers separately in POSIX? Native
doesn't do so, e.g.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux