Re: linux-next: manual merge of the crypto tree

["H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>]

Zhang, Austin wrote:
>>> new x86 feature bits should definitely show up in the x86 tree too
> So can we add sse4.1 into this patch also as: 
> #define X86_FEATURE_XMM4_1	(4*32+19)
> even though now no obvious user is asking it in kernel. 

The best would be to:

1. rename all the feature bits which have inconsistent names in their
    #defines and in /proc/cpuinfo;
2. generate the /proc/cpuinfo table
    (arch/x86/kernel/cpu/feature_names.c) automatically from
    cpufeature.h.

2. is quite trivial, and 1. can be done largely automatically.  I will 
experiment with this.

	-hpa