Re: [PATCH] t6013: replace use of 'tac' with equivalent Perl

[Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>]

Thomas Rast wrote:
> 'tac' is not available everywhere, so substitute the equivalent Perl
> code 'print reverse <>'.  Noticed by Brian Gernhardt.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
> ---
> 
> Thanks for pointing this out.  However, I tried to avoid hardcoding
> those results by recommendation of t/README (last paragraph):
> 
>   ... If all the test scripts hardcoded the object IDs like
>   t0000-basic.sh does, that defeats the purpose of t0000-basic.sh,
>   which is to isolate that level of validation in one place.  Your
>   test also ends up needing updating when such a change to the
>   internal happens, so do _not_ do it and leave the low level of
>   validation to t0000-basic.sh.
> 
> So I would favour this fix.  I think this should be ok because we
> depend on Perl anyway.
> 

If it isn't, you could always do
	sed '1!G;h;$!d'
or
	sed -n '1!G;h;$p'
instead.

Both of them are very portable indeed.

-- 
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson@op5.se
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231