All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
To: Michael Noisternig <mnoist@cosy.sbg.ac.at>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (more) epoll troubles
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 11:32:54 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48BC2746.1090006@shaw.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48BC26D9.1040300@shaw.ca>

Robert Hancock wrote:
> Michael Noisternig wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> and sorry again if this is the wrong place to ask (again, please hint 
>> to me to an appropriate place to ask in that case).
>>
>> After experimenting with epoll edge-triggered mode I am clueless why 
>> on a few occassions I seem to not get any input notification despite 
>> data is available.
>>
>> In detail: I have set up sockets with epoll events 
>> EPOLLET|EPOLLRDHUP|EPOLLIN. When I get EPOLLIN for a socket, I read() 
>> as long as I get what I asked for, i.e. whenever read() returns either 
>> EAGAIN or less data than I asked for I take this as indication that I 
>> must wait for another EPOLLIN notification. However, this does not 
>> seem to work always.
>>
>> Here is some log from my program:
>>
>> 0x9e6b8a8: read not avail (1460/2048 read)
>> i.e. tried to read 2048 bytes, got 1460 -> assume must wait for 
>> EPOLLIN for more data to read
>> (note that the fd is always in the epoll set with 
>> EPOLLET|EPOLLRDHUP|EPOLLIN)
> 
> It would likely be better to always continue trying to read until EAGAIN 
> is returned, even if the read returned less than the requested amount, 
> as implied here:
> 
> http://linux.die.net/man/7/epoll
> 
> "The function do_use_fd() uses the new ready file descriptor until 
> EAGAIN is returned by either read(2) or write(2). An event driven state 
> machine application should, after having received EAGAIN, record its 
> current state so that at the next call to do_use_fd() it will continue 
> to read(2) or write(2) from where it stopped before. "

Though, this is somewhat contradicted by the FAQ section:

"the condition that the read/write I/O space is exhausted can be 
detected by checking the amount of data read/write from/to the target 
file descriptor. For example, if you call read(2) by asking to read a 
certain amount of data and read(2) returns a lower number of bytes, you 
can be sure to have exhausted the read I/O space for such file descriptor."

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-01 17:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <fa.zt4K08zThcs3bS6QJSiWmdw4amQ@ifi.uio.no>
2008-09-01 17:31 ` (more) epoll troubles Robert Hancock
2008-09-01 17:32   ` Robert Hancock [this message]
2008-09-01 18:29     ` Michael Noisternig
2008-09-01 18:46       ` Davide Libenzi
2008-08-31 13:38 Michael Noisternig
2008-09-03  5:57 ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48BC2746.1090006@shaw.ca \
    --to=hancockr@shaw.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mnoist@cosy.sbg.ac.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.