From: Jon Tollefson <kniht@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: libhugetlbfs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: Buglet in 16G page handling
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 12:12:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48BD73FB.1050601@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080902050510.GB12965@yookeroo.seuss>
David Gibson wrote:
> When BenH and I were looking at the new code for handling 16G pages,
> we noticed a small bug. It doesn't actually break anything user
> visible, but it's certainly not the way things are supposed to be.
> The 16G patches didn't update the huge_pte_offset() and
> huge_pte_alloc() functions, which means that the hugepte tables for
> 16G pages will be allocated much further down the page table tree than
> they should be - allocating several levels of page table with a single
> entry in them along the way.
>
> The patch below is supposed to fix this, cleaning up the existing
> handling of 64k vs 16M pages while its at it. However, it needs some
> testing.
>
> I've checked that it doesn't break existing 16M support, either with
> 4k or 64k base pages. I haven't figured out how to test with 64k
> pages yet, at least until the multisize support goes into
> libhugetlbfs. For 16G pages, I just don't have access to a machine
> with enough memory to test. Jon, presumably you must have found such
> a machine when you did the 16G page support in the first place. Do
> you still have access, and can you test this patch?
>
I do have access to a machine to test it. I applied the patch to -rc4
and used a pseries_defconfig. I boot with
default_hugepagesz=16G... in order to test huge page sizes other then
16M at this point.
Running the libhugetlbfs test suite it gets as far as Readback (64):
PASS
before it hits the following program check.
kernel BUG at arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c:98!
cpu 0x0: Vector: 700 (Program Check) at [c0000002843db580]
pc: c000000000035ff4: .free_hugepte_range+0x2c/0x7c
lr: c000000000036af0: .hugetlb_free_pgd_range+0x2c0/0x398
sp: c0000002843db800
msr: 8000000000029032
current = 0xc00000028417a2a0
paca = 0xc0000000008d4300
pid = 3334, comm = readback
kernel BUG at arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c:98!
enter ? for help
[c0000002843db880] c000000000036af0 .hugetlb_free_pgd_range+0x2c0/0x398
[c0000002843db980] c0000000000da224 .free_pgtables+0x98/0x140
[c0000002843dba40] c0000000000dc4d8 .exit_mmap+0x13c/0x22c
[c0000002843dbb00] c00000000005b218 .mmput+0x78/0x148
[c0000002843dbba0] c000000000060528 .exit_mm+0x164/0x18c
[c0000002843dbc50] c000000000062718 .do_exit+0x2e8/0x858
[c0000002843dbd10] c000000000062d24 .do_group_exit+0x9c/0xd0
[c0000002843dbdb0] c000000000062d74 .sys_exit_group+0x1c/0x30
[c0000002843dbe30] c0000000000086d4 syscall_exit+0x0/0x40
--- Exception: c00 (System Call) at 000000802db7a530
SP (fffffa6e290) is in userspace
Line 98 appears to be this BUG_ON
static inline pte_t *hugepd_page(hugepd_t hpd)
{
BUG_ON(!(hpd.pd & HUGEPD_OK));
Jon
> Index: working-2.6/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> ===================================================================
> --- working-2.6.orig/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c 2008-09-02 13:39:52.000000000 +1000
> +++ working-2.6/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c 2008-09-02 14:08:56.000000000 +1000
> @@ -128,29 +128,37 @@ static int __hugepte_alloc(struct mm_str
> return 0;
> }
>
> -/* Base page size affects how we walk hugetlb page tables */
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES
> -#define hpmd_offset(pud, addr, h) pmd_offset(pud, addr)
> -#define hpmd_alloc(mm, pud, addr, h) pmd_alloc(mm, pud, addr)
> -#else
> -static inline
> -pmd_t *hpmd_offset(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr, struct hstate *hstate)
> +
> +static pud_t *hpud_offset(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long addr, struct hstate *hstate)
> +{
> + if (huge_page_shift(hstate) < PUD_SHIFT)
> + return pud_offset(pgd, addr);
> + else
> + return (pud_t *) pgd;
> +}
> +static pud_t *hpud_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long addr,
> + struct hstate *hstate)
> {
> - if (huge_page_shift(hstate) == PAGE_SHIFT_64K)
> + if (huge_page_shift(hstate) < PUD_SHIFT)
> + return pud_alloc(mm, pgd, addr);
> + else
> + return (pud_t *) pgd;
> +}
> +static pmd_t *hpmd_offset(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr, struct hstate *hstate)
> +{
> + if (huge_page_shift(hstate) < PMD_SHIFT)
> return pmd_offset(pud, addr);
> else
> return (pmd_t *) pud;
> }
> -static inline
> -pmd_t *hpmd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm, pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr,
> - struct hstate *hstate)
> +static pmd_t *hpmd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm, pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr,
> + struct hstate *hstate)
> {
> - if (huge_page_shift(hstate) == PAGE_SHIFT_64K)
> + if (huge_page_shift(hstate) < PMD_SHIFT)
> return pmd_alloc(mm, pud, addr);
> else
> return (pmd_t *) pud;
> }
> -#endif
>
> /* Build list of addresses of gigantic pages. This function is used in early
> * boot before the buddy or bootmem allocator is setup.
> @@ -204,7 +212,7 @@ pte_t *huge_pte_offset(struct mm_struct
>
> pg = pgd_offset(mm, addr);
> if (!pgd_none(*pg)) {
> - pu = pud_offset(pg, addr);
> + pu = hpud_offset(pg, addr, hstate);
> if (!pud_none(*pu)) {
> pm = hpmd_offset(pu, addr, hstate);
> if (!pmd_none(*pm))
> @@ -233,7 +241,7 @@ pte_t *huge_pte_alloc(struct mm_struct *
> addr &= hstate->mask;
>
> pg = pgd_offset(mm, addr);
> - pu = pud_alloc(mm, pg, addr);
> + pu = hpud_alloc(mm, pg, addr, hstate);
>
> if (pu) {
> pm = hpmd_alloc(mm, pu, addr, hstate);
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-02 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-02 5:05 Buglet in 16G page handling David Gibson
2008-09-02 12:44 ` [Libhugetlbfs-devel] " Mel Gorman
2008-09-02 16:25 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-09-02 21:05 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-02 22:16 ` Jon Tollefson
2008-09-02 22:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-03 14:11 ` Jon Tollefson
2008-09-02 17:12 ` Jon Tollefson [this message]
2008-09-03 0:20 ` David Gibson
2008-09-03 22:19 ` Jon Tollefson
2008-09-04 6:22 ` David Gibson
2008-09-04 21:08 ` Jon Tollefson
2008-09-05 1:36 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48BD73FB.1050601@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=kniht@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=libhugetlbfs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.