From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mukesh Rathor Subject: Re: gdbsx? Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 17:45:34 -0700 Message-ID: <48BDDE2E.7090102@oracle.com> References: Reply-To: mukesh.rathor@oracle.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser Cc: Xen Developers , Jun Koi List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org yeah, I've been meaning to refresh for a while now, but time just flies by. Anyhoo, the ext tree is refreshed now. I did it in two steps so that one could easily come up with a patch for 3.3.0 and another refresh to latest. Hopefully, any time soon, I'll stop spending time on dealing with time issues in debugger and have the time to put patches somewhere in timely manner, because its no fun when time goes backwards, or forwards so faaast... thanks, Mukesh Keir Fraser wrote: > It's being maintained as an external repository: > http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/debuggers.hg. > > Unfortunately it apparently isn't a clone of xen-unstable.hg but a 3-month > old copy which has not since been resynchronised. Mukesh: I would recommend > you maintain a patch queue or a tree whose parent is xen-unstable.hg, which > you can periodically pull from and re-merge your patches. Otherwise you have > a debugger for an old fixed version of xen-unstable.hg which is rather less > useful in the long run. > > -- Keir > > On 1/9/08 16:59, "Jun Koi" wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> A talk about gdbsx at the last summit looks very useful. Is there any >> roadmap to include it into the tree? Or at least some supports for it >> is merged, so it can stay outside the tree if that is more desired? >> >> Thanks, >> Jun >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-devel mailing list >> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel >