From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Bernhard Bock <mailinglists@bock.nu>
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: conntrackd failover works partially, was Re: conntrack performance test results in INVALID packets
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:13:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48BE5547.8030505@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48BD6FEC.5090100@bock.nu>
Bernhard Bock wrote:
> Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>> During the fail-over, keepalived recovers the virtual IPs and conntrackd
>> commits the states into the kernel. The commit takes very short but you
>> can still lose some packets if the state is not yet present in the
>> kernel - thus, these packets are logged as invalid and dropped as we
>> don't find any matching state (with a sane stateful rule-set, of
>> course). *However*, the TCP sessions should recover as the peer or the
>> server retransmits the packet in short, so I don't understand why you
>> lose nearly all the sessions.
>
> Agreed. My problem is, it doesn't recover. It keeps dropping packets as
> long as the test runs (the test stops at some point in time with socket
> timeouts).
Hm, I remember that the problem reported with RHEL kernel was similar.
That user assured me that the state entries were successfully committed
- ie. he could verify that conntrack -L displays them - but the packets
were not matching the injected states, thus, leading to invalid logs and
drops. He ended up changing to Ubuntu. However, if it is a Fedora/RHEL
problem, it would be nice to know what's wrong with it.
>> Is the firewall sending RST packets to the peer/server to close
>> connections? If so, I remember a similar report with a RHEL kernel:
>
> Will check tomorrow.
OK, wait for your news.
--
"Los honestos son inadaptados sociales" -- Les Luthiers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-03 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-18 9:39 conntrack performance test results in INVALID packets Bernhard Bock
2008-07-18 10:13 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-07-18 10:52 ` Bernhard Bock
2008-07-18 12:14 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-07-18 14:20 ` conntrackd failover works partially, was " Bernhard Bock
2008-07-21 0:37 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-07-21 14:22 ` conntrackd failover works partially Bernhard Bock
2008-07-23 8:51 ` Bernhard Bock
2008-07-23 12:50 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-07-23 15:20 ` Bernhard Bock
2008-08-08 8:47 ` conntrackd failover works partially, was Re: conntrack performance test results in INVALID packets Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-08-08 12:58 ` Bernhard Bock
2008-09-02 9:39 ` Bernhard Bock
2008-09-02 9:56 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-09-02 12:34 ` Bernhard Bock
2008-09-02 12:48 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-09-02 15:18 ` Bernhard Bock
2008-09-02 16:22 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-09-02 16:55 ` Bernhard Bock
2008-09-03 9:13 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2008-09-03 11:26 ` Bernhard Bock
2008-09-04 12:29 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-09-04 13:27 ` Bernhard Bock
2008-09-05 10:55 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-09-04 11:40 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48BE5547.8030505@netfilter.org \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=mailinglists@bock.nu \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.