From: Anders Aagaard <aagaande@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Suspend-devel] Resume performance
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:46:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48C13827.1010409@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200809051308.14079.rjw@sisk.pl>
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, 5 of September 2008, Anders Aagaard wrote:
>> Hi
>
> Hi,
>
> This is a kernel problem, so let's CC the LKML.
>
>> I have a intel P35 board with a quad core cpu in it, it's currently
>> running as a server for a small network, and I'd like to be able to shut
>> it down when idle, and use wake on lan to wake it up when it's needed.
>> Now I got that part working quite well, but for some reason I have a
>> long delay in resume.
>>
>> I seem to remember being able to resume this computer in 2-3 seconds
>> when I was testing it, now it needs 35 seconds to resume. It seems
>> regardless of resume options used, and it always resumes to a working
>> state without problems.
>
> What kernel are you using at the moment and which one was used for the
> testing?
I'm using gentoo's 2.6.25-r7, I've also tried vanilla sources.
>
>> I've tried quite a lot of things, booting with noapic/nosmp, booting a
>> kernel without usb/network drivers, disabling ahci (using ata_piix
>> driver instead of ahci), and there's always that one long delay. And
>> I'm not quite sure how the kernel printk timing information works, so
>> I'm not sure whats causing that delay.
>>
>> Output from dmesg when booting with nosmp (to get accurate timing data):
>> scripts/show_delta -b "Force enabled HPET at resume"
>> [349.821150 < 7.039261 >] ata3.00: configured for UDMA/133
>> [349.821160 < 7.039271 >] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdc] 976773168 512-byte hardware
>> sectors (500108 MB)
>> [349.821165 < 7.039276 >] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdc] Write Protect is off
>> [349.821166 < 7.039277 >] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdc] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
>> [349.821173 < 7.039284 >] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdc] Write cache: enabled, read
>> cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
>> [349.972801 < 7.190912 >] ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123
>> SControl 300)
>> [349.979060 < 7.197171 >] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
>> [349.979070 < 7.197181 >] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 976771055 512-byte hardware
>> sectors (500107 MB)
>> [349.979075 < 7.197186 >] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
>> [349.979076 < 7.197187 >] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
>> [349.979083 < 7.197194 >] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read
>> cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
>
> It looks like this happens here. Can you try to unload the network driver
> before suspend, please?
I tried to build a kernel without it, and it still takes the exact same
amount to boot, I've also tried unloading usb drivers and it takes the
exact same amount of time.
>
>> [373.945179 < 31.163290 >] r8169: eth0: link up
>> [373.952159 < 31.170270 >] PM: Writing back config space on device
>> 0000:02:02.0 at offset f (was 4020100, writing 4020104)
>> [373.952172 < 31.170283 >] PM: Writing back config space on device
>> 0000:02:02.0 at offset 5 (was 0, writing fddf8000)
>> [373.952176 < 31.170287 >] PM: Writing back config space on device
>> 0000:02:02.0 at offset 4 (was 0, writing fddfd000)
>> [373.952180 < 31.170291 >] PM: Writing back config space on device
>> 0000:02:02.0 at offset 3 (was 0, writing 4410)
>> [373.952185 < 31.170296 >] PM: Writing back config space on device
>> 0000:02:02.0 at offset 1 (was 2100000, writing 2100006)
>>
>> Notice the long delay between all hd's found and it writing back config
>> space, note that this happens with or without that network card driver
>> in the kernel.
>>
>> Attaching full log of boot + suspend/resume cycle, kernel booted with
>> nosmp/noapic, it takes the same amount of time without those options,
>> but timing data gets a bit garbled.
>>
>> Thanks for your work so far, it's working quite well and saving me a lot
>> of power doing it this way, at this point I'm just trying to get it
>> faster :)
>
> Sure, 35 seconds to resume is hardly acceptable.
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-05 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <48C10908.60101@gmail.com>
2008-09-05 11:08 ` [Suspend-devel] Resume performance Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-05 13:46 ` Anders Aagaard [this message]
2008-09-05 18:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-07 10:35 ` Anders Aagaard
2008-09-09 14:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-09 20:09 ` Anders Aagaard
2008-09-09 20:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-09 20:31 ` Anders Aagaard
2008-09-11 8:53 ` Anders Aagaard
2008-09-12 12:23 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48C13827.1010409@gmail.com \
--to=aagaande@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.