From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] x86: signal: split out frame setups
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:28:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48C1C086.2090807@ct.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48C1BF41.8040404@ct.jp.nec.com>
From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>
Make setup_rt_frame() and split out frame setups from handle_signal().
This is for cosmetic unification of handle_signal().
Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/signal_32.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
arch/x86/kernel/signal_64.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/signal_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/signal_32.c
index bd9b650..48982f7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/signal_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/signal_32.c
@@ -338,8 +338,8 @@ get_sigframe(struct k_sigaction *ka, struct pt_regs *regs, size_t frame_size,
}
static int
-setup_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, sigset_t *set,
- struct pt_regs *regs)
+__setup_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, sigset_t *set,
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
struct sigframe __user *frame;
void __user *restorer;
@@ -416,8 +416,8 @@ give_sigsegv:
return -EFAULT;
}
-static int setup_rt_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info,
- sigset_t *set, struct pt_regs *regs)
+static int __setup_rt_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info,
+ sigset_t *set, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
struct rt_sigframe __user *frame;
void __user *restorer;
@@ -502,6 +502,21 @@ give_sigsegv:
* OK, we're invoking a handler:
*/
static int
+setup_rt_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info,
+ sigset_t *set, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ /* Set up the stack frame */
+ if (ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_SIGINFO)
+ ret = __setup_rt_frame(sig, ka, info, set, regs);
+ else
+ ret = __setup_frame(sig, ka, set, regs);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int
handle_signal(unsigned long sig, siginfo_t *info, struct k_sigaction *ka,
sigset_t *oldset, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
@@ -537,11 +552,7 @@ handle_signal(unsigned long sig, siginfo_t *info, struct k_sigaction *ka,
likely(test_and_clear_thread_flag(TIF_FORCED_TF)))
regs->flags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_TF;
- /* Set up the stack frame */
- if (ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_SIGINFO)
- ret = setup_rt_frame(sig, ka, info, oldset, regs);
- else
- ret = setup_frame(sig, ka, oldset, regs);
+ ret = setup_rt_frame(sig, ka, info, oldset, regs);
if (ret)
return ret;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/signal_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/signal_64.c
index 19e2b91..8fbdd23 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/signal_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/signal_64.c
@@ -195,8 +195,8 @@ get_stack(struct k_sigaction *ka, struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long size)
return (void __user *)round_down(sp - size, 64);
}
-static int setup_rt_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info,
- sigset_t *set, struct pt_regs *regs)
+static int __setup_rt_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info,
+ sigset_t *set, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
struct rt_sigframe __user *frame;
void __user *fp = NULL;
@@ -280,6 +280,24 @@ give_sigsegv:
/*
* OK, we're invoking a handler
*/
+static int
+setup_rt_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info,
+ sigset_t *set, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION
+ if (test_thread_flag(TIF_IA32)) {
+ if (ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_SIGINFO)
+ ret = ia32_setup_rt_frame(sig, ka, info, set, regs);
+ else
+ ret = ia32_setup_frame(sig, ka, set, regs);
+ } else
+#endif
+ ret = __setup_rt_frame(sig, ka, info, set, regs);
+
+ return ret;
+}
static int
handle_signal(unsigned long sig, siginfo_t *info, struct k_sigaction *ka,
@@ -317,14 +335,6 @@ handle_signal(unsigned long sig, siginfo_t *info, struct k_sigaction *ka,
likely(test_and_clear_thread_flag(TIF_FORCED_TF)))
regs->flags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_TF;
-#ifdef CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION
- if (test_thread_flag(TIF_IA32)) {
- if (ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_SIGINFO)
- ret = ia32_setup_rt_frame(sig, ka, info, oldset, regs);
- else
- ret = ia32_setup_frame(sig, ka, oldset, regs);
- } else
-#endif
ret = setup_rt_frame(sig, ka, info, oldset, regs);
if (ret == 0) {
--
1.5.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-05 23:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-05 23:22 [PATCH 0/5] x86: signal works for unification Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-09-05 23:26 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86_32: signal: use syscall_get_nr and error Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-09-05 23:27 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86_32: signal: introduce signal_fault() Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-09-05 23:27 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86: signal: make NR_restart_syscall Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-09-05 23:28 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto [this message]
2008-09-05 23:28 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86_32: signal: move signal number conversion to upper layer Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-09-06 12:56 ` [PATCH 0/5] x86: signal works for unification Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48C1C086.2090807@ct.jp.nec.com \
--to=h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.