From: "Alan D. Brunelle" <Alan.Brunelle@hp.com>
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: Benchmarking results: DSS elapsed time values w/ rq_affinity=0/1 - Jens' for-2.6.28 tree
Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 19:21:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48C31095.6020206@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48C15C02.7060504@hp.com>
Here are some results obtained during runs where we varied the number of
readers & the multi-block read counts. 5 runs per rq_affinity setting
were done, and the averages are plotted at:
http://free.linux.hp.com/~adb/jens/08-09-05/by_mbr.jpeg
In all cases we are seeing a noticeable improvement in reduction of
elapsed time to perform the tasks, and again we are seeing much tighter
deviations with rq_affinity set to 1:
Min Avg Max Std Dev
----- ----- ----- --------
mbrs= 32 nrdrs= 64 rq=0: 30.57 31.50 34.06 1.456108
mbrs= 32 nrdrs= 64 rq=1: 29.27 29.59 29.96 0.325469 6.05% improvement
mbrs= 32 nrdrs=128 rq=0: 28.14 28.48 29.32 0.480208
mbrs= 32 nrdrs=128 rq=1: 27.54 27.88 28.48 0.359194 2.11% improvement
mbrs= 32 nrdrs=256 rq=0: 33.05 33.70 34.30 0.548151
mbrs= 32 nrdrs=256 rq=1: 33.10 33.36 33.74 0.257158 1.01% improvement
mbrs= 64 nrdrs= 64 rq=0: 30.53 30.74 31.10 0.255441
mbrs= 64 nrdrs= 64 rq=1: 29.40 29.65 29.91 0.187216 3.55% improvement
mbrs= 64 nrdrs=128 rq=0: 28.09 28.79 29.23 0.484149
mbrs= 64 nrdrs=128 rq=1: 27.73 27.96 28.33 0.226429 2.89% improvement
mbrs= 64 nrdrs=256 rq=0: 33.35 34.04 34.76 0.518816
mbrs= 64 nrdrs=256 rq=1: 33.02 33.13 33.25 0.088034 2.67% improvement
mbrs=128 nrdrs= 64 rq=0: 30.37 30.75 31.23 0.329439
mbrs=128 nrdrs= 64 rq=1: 29.20 29.49 29.82 0.221179 4.08% improvement
mbrs=128 nrdrs=128 rq=0: 28.04 28.54 29.00 0.392785
mbrs=128 nrdrs=128 rq=1: 27.76 28.08 28.26 0.190840 1.63% improvement
mbrs=128 nrdrs=256 rq=0: 33.37 33.89 34.30 0.448297
mbrs=128 nrdrs=256 rq=1: 33.04 33.30 33.56 0.203175 1.76% improvement
mbrs=256 nrdrs= 64 rq=0: 30.55 30.80 30.94 0.167392
mbrs=256 nrdrs= 64 rq=1: 29.23 29.57 29.91 0.305156 3.99% improvement
mbrs=256 nrdrs=128 rq=0: 28.38 28.82 29.20 0.305172
mbrs=256 nrdrs=128 rq=1: 27.78 27.92 28.11 0.142583 3.12% improvement
mbrs=256 nrdrs=256 rq=0: 33.25 34.21 34.88 0.598398
mbrs=256 nrdrs=256 rq=1: 33.11 33.23 33.48 0.154499 2.88% improvement
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-06 23:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-05 16:19 Benchmarking results: DSS elapsed time values w/ rq_affinity=0/1 - Jens' for-2.6.28 tree Alan D. Brunelle
2008-09-06 23:21 ` Alan D. Brunelle [this message]
2008-09-08 18:10 ` Jens Axboe
2008-09-08 22:30 ` Alan D. Brunelle
2008-09-09 16:54 ` Alan D. Brunelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48C31095.6020206@hp.com \
--to=alan.brunelle@hp.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.