All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alan D. Brunelle" <Alan.Brunelle@hp.com>
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: Benchmarking results: DSS elapsed time values w/ rq_affinity=0/1 - Jens' for-2.6.28 tree
Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 19:21:57 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48C31095.6020206@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48C15C02.7060504@hp.com>

Here are some results obtained during runs where we varied the number of
 readers & the multi-block read counts. 5 runs per rq_affinity setting
were done, and the averages are plotted at:

http://free.linux.hp.com/~adb/jens/08-09-05/by_mbr.jpeg

In all cases we are seeing a noticeable improvement in reduction of
elapsed time to perform the tasks, and again we are seeing much tighter
deviations with rq_affinity set to 1:

                          Min   Avg   Max   Std Dev
                         ----- ----- -----  --------
mbrs= 32 nrdrs= 64 rq=0: 30.57 31.50 34.06  1.456108
mbrs= 32 nrdrs= 64 rq=1: 29.27 29.59 29.96  0.325469   6.05% improvement

mbrs= 32 nrdrs=128 rq=0: 28.14 28.48 29.32  0.480208
mbrs= 32 nrdrs=128 rq=1: 27.54 27.88 28.48  0.359194   2.11% improvement

mbrs= 32 nrdrs=256 rq=0: 33.05 33.70 34.30  0.548151
mbrs= 32 nrdrs=256 rq=1: 33.10 33.36 33.74  0.257158   1.01% improvement

mbrs= 64 nrdrs= 64 rq=0: 30.53 30.74 31.10  0.255441
mbrs= 64 nrdrs= 64 rq=1: 29.40 29.65 29.91  0.187216   3.55% improvement

mbrs= 64 nrdrs=128 rq=0: 28.09 28.79 29.23  0.484149
mbrs= 64 nrdrs=128 rq=1: 27.73 27.96 28.33  0.226429   2.89% improvement

mbrs= 64 nrdrs=256 rq=0: 33.35 34.04 34.76  0.518816
mbrs= 64 nrdrs=256 rq=1: 33.02 33.13 33.25  0.088034   2.67% improvement

mbrs=128 nrdrs= 64 rq=0: 30.37 30.75 31.23  0.329439
mbrs=128 nrdrs= 64 rq=1: 29.20 29.49 29.82  0.221179   4.08% improvement

mbrs=128 nrdrs=128 rq=0: 28.04 28.54 29.00  0.392785
mbrs=128 nrdrs=128 rq=1: 27.76 28.08 28.26  0.190840   1.63% improvement

mbrs=128 nrdrs=256 rq=0: 33.37 33.89 34.30  0.448297
mbrs=128 nrdrs=256 rq=1: 33.04 33.30 33.56  0.203175   1.76% improvement

mbrs=256 nrdrs= 64 rq=0: 30.55 30.80 30.94  0.167392
mbrs=256 nrdrs= 64 rq=1: 29.23 29.57 29.91  0.305156   3.99% improvement

mbrs=256 nrdrs=128 rq=0: 28.38 28.82 29.20  0.305172
mbrs=256 nrdrs=128 rq=1: 27.78 27.92 28.11  0.142583   3.12% improvement

mbrs=256 nrdrs=256 rq=0: 33.25 34.21 34.88  0.598398
mbrs=256 nrdrs=256 rq=1: 33.11 33.23 33.48  0.154499   2.88% improvement


  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-06 23:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-05 16:19 Benchmarking results: DSS elapsed time values w/ rq_affinity=0/1 - Jens' for-2.6.28 tree Alan D. Brunelle
2008-09-06 23:21 ` Alan D. Brunelle [this message]
2008-09-08 18:10   ` Jens Axboe
2008-09-08 22:30     ` Alan D. Brunelle
2008-09-09 16:54     ` Alan D. Brunelle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48C31095.6020206@hp.com \
    --to=alan.brunelle@hp.com \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.