From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frank van der Linden Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPU online/offline support in Xen Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 13:20:05 -0600 Message-ID: <48C6CC65.7010307@Sun.COM> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: In-reply-to: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser Cc: Gavin Maltby , Christoph Egger , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, "Shan, Haitao" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Keir Fraser wrote: > You can hardly expect to do work in private and then 'surface the submarine' > when others post patches and expect them to do the work to merge with you. > If Intel's patches look acceptable then they will be checked in and Sun will > have to do the merge work to get any extra enhancements or features in their > patchset to work on top. That is unless you can see strong reason why Sun's > patches are technically better. > Well, not quite in private, you may remember that I did a presentation at the Xen Summit. Anyway, of course there is no point in not accepting or delaying a patch for something that is not available yet. I'll comment on the submitted patch, I think I see some issues that we found that aren't addressed in it. - Frank