From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755994AbYIIWaz (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2008 18:30:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755740AbYIIWap (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2008 18:30:45 -0400 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:37272 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755736AbYIIWao (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2008 18:30:44 -0400 Message-ID: <48C6F913.1010509@goop.org> Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 15:30:43 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yinghai Lu , "Eric W. Biederman" , Ingo Molnar CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: TARGET_CPUS in assign_irq_vector X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On x86-64, the genapic implementations of target_cpus returns cpu_online_map. What if more cpus have yet to come online? Shouldn't it be cpu_possible_map? Though I'm probably confused. I don't really know what the intent of target_cpus and vector_allocation_domain is. Thanks, J