From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anders Aagaard Subject: Re: Correct fsck behavior on boot Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:21:11 +0200 Message-ID: <48C90D37.1060201@gmail.com> References: <48C9004A.5080504@gmail.com> <80294dc60809110450i20d43214o144b754b33713f48@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=a61eerUZKqf0g+CsgAuJMBspW28+92V59gQR8yCvf+s=; b=B6fZ8yRqZjMmbTzp5ueL6ryZ/DlueB31RVMagyhUdbEZhjzavWwqrgFtIyb7KdZGxJ U0MuIyQxgazgFeFluVaLsePgcNXJIlaQTgr35O9yN8LLr6/yAjSbJJ3Mnl6SuxxffVMh EOo0eJgcMwEY6XSO9Y98w+EflTFdIl2QWb6xE= In-Reply-To: <80294dc60809110450i20d43214o144b754b33713f48@mail.gmail.com> Sender: reiserfs-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Alexander Lyamin Cc: reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org Alexander Lyamin wrote: > Why one have to worry about cleanness of a _journaled_ fs ? > Its seems like immediate return on -a is intended behavior. I suspect it is, I'm just making sure I have something to fire back with when a gentoo developer complains about my patch here: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=237393 > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Anders Aagaard > wrote: > > Hi > > What's the correct options to pass to reiser4.fsck on boot to get it > to check the filesystem when it's not marked as clean? > > reiser4 fsck does implement -a, but it seems to return right away, > including when the filesystem wasn't unmounted cleanly. Is the > filesystem integrity still secured by hash'es, so skipping fsck is > intentional? > --check --fix seems a tad bit excessive on every boot. > > Anders Aagaard > > > > -- > connecting the dots