From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gianluca Guida Subject: Re: Re: Poor performance on HVM (kernbench) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:25:32 +0100 Message-ID: <48C9548C.4060709@eu.citrix.com> References: <1e16a9ed0809101123m71a12030v7d06501f6467f93@mail.gmail.com> <1e16a9ed0809101422p6a58304dxaa1a92847109a518@mail.gmail.com> <48C8EC48.6080507@eu.citrix.com> <48C9367B.6090003@eu.citrix.com> <1e16a9ed0809110835p73165150t3f78d75b2f2ca8eb@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1e16a9ed0809110835p73165150t3f78d75b2f2ca8eb@mail.gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: deshantm@gmail.com Cc: Muli Ben-Yehuda , Anthony Liguori , xen-devel mailing list List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Todd Deshane wrote: > Can you also run kernbench on native for comparison? Here tehy are, with a two CPUs dom0. Thu Sep 11 13:03:57 EDT 2008 2.6.18.8-xen Average Optimal load -j 8 Run (std deviation): Elapsed Time 181.51 (0.550318) User Time 300.494 (0.965572) System Time 54.198 (0.784391) Percent CPU 195 (0.707107) Context Switches 26611.8 (205.029) Sleeps 29778.8 (330.637)