All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Dean Nelson <dcn@sgi.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Alan Mayer <ajm@sgi.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	jeremy@goop.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
	suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.lu@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] dynamically allocate arch specific system vectors
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:04:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48C979D3.5000308@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080911152304.GA13655@sgi.com>

Dean Nelson wrote:
> 
> We (SGI) need somewhere around eight vectors.
> 
> There are two kernel modules, sgi-gru and sgi-xp (in drivers/misc), that
> each need two vectors. And there's the broadcast assist unit (BAU) that is
> involved in tlb shootdown on uv, which currently uses statically reserved
> vector 0xf8 (UV_BAU_MESSAGE -- see uv_bau_init()). I know of a debugger that
> also uses 0xf8 because it was previously available until UV_BAU_MESSAGE came
> along. The BAU would be happy with a dynamically allocated system vector.
> We have a couple of other things in the works that also need vectors.
> 
> All of these eight or so vectors are only meaningful on SGI uv systems.
> 

Are these kernel-internal vectors, or exposed to userspace (i.e. the INT 
instruction works in userspace)?  From what I'm gathering, I think this 
is the former.

There are the occational user who wants fixed user-space addressible 
vectors, effectively as secondary system call entry vectors (lguest is 
the only in-kernel user that I know of); those need to be static and 
non-conflicting, which is kind of difficult.  It seems to me that 
anything else probably should be possible to be dynamic.

	-hpa

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-09-11 20:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-08 15:37 [Fwd: [PATCH] x86_64: (NEW) Dynamically allocate arch specific system vectors] Alan Mayer
2008-08-11 16:59 ` [PATCH] x86_64: (NEW) Dynamically allocate arch specific system vectors Ingo Molnar
2008-08-11 17:14   ` Alan Mayer
2008-08-11 19:39     ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-08-11 19:51       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-11 19:55         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-11 20:10         ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-08-11 20:02       ` Alan Mayer
2008-09-11 15:23       ` [RFC 0/4] dynamically " Dean Nelson
2008-09-11 15:25         ` [RFC 1/4] switch vector_irq[] from irq number to irq_desc pointer Dean Nelson
2008-09-11 15:27         ` [RFC 2/4] introduce dynamically allocated system vectors Dean Nelson
2008-09-14 15:39           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-14 15:46           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-11 15:28         ` [RFC 3/4] switch static system vector allocation to use vector_irq[] Dean Nelson
2008-09-11 15:29         ` [RFC 4/4] switch non-standard SYSCALL_VECTOR " Dean Nelson
2008-09-14 15:40           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-14 15:42           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-11 20:04         ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2008-09-12 11:46           ` [RFC 0/4] dynamically allocate arch specific system vectors Dean Nelson
2008-09-14 15:35         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-14 15:48           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-15 21:50           ` Dean Nelson
2008-09-16  8:24             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-16 20:46               ` Dean Nelson
2008-09-17 17:30                 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2008-09-17 18:59                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-09-18 13:37                     ` Dean Nelson
2008-09-18 19:18                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-17 19:15                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-17 20:21                   ` Jack Steiner
2008-09-17 22:15                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-09-18  1:09                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-18 19:10                       ` Jack Steiner
2008-09-19  0:28                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-09-19  8:48                           ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48C979D3.5000308@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=Yinghai.lu@amd.com \
    --cc=ajm@sgi.com \
    --cc=dcn@sgi.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.