From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1756508AbYILMFw@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1756508AbYILMFw (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:05:52 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752780AbYILMFl
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:05:41 -0400
Received: from ns1.bluetone.cz ([212.158.128.13]:41224 "EHLO ns1.bluetone.cz"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752728AbYILMFk (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:05:40 -0400
X-Greylist: delayed 8890 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:05:40 EDT
Message-ID: <48CA386C.609@slax.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:37:48 +0200
From: Tomas M <tomas@slax.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080707)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: advantages of AXFS over squashfs?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hello.

I read somewhere that AXFS is going to be a part of Linux kernel 2.6.28
( http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS6179099416.html?kc=rss )

What are the advantages of AXFS compared to squashfs?
Why not to include squashfs instead?

Thank you

Tomas M
slax.org