Re: Stable versions of mdadm ...

[berk walker <berk@panix.com>]

Bill Davidsen wrote:
> berk walker wrote:
>> Neil - is there an history file of "Stable" mdadm releases?  or are 
>> there any?  I would trust YOU [and yours] more than canned firmware.
>>
> With one exception long ago I don't think I would regard any as 
> "unstable." Regular updates do show up, of course, but unless you are 
> doing something really unusual you should have no issues. Usually the 
> one the distribution ships is well tested, so unless you need some 
> very recent feature there's no need for the bleeding edge.
>> Hey - you should buy US, the $ [USD] isn't worth squat - this is the 
>> 1st time in my memory [I'm 65] that we actually don't have a trade 
>> deficit.
>
I should have said versions/releases vs. kernel levels.  And Bill - - 
90% of this newsgroup/forum IS either about what is "broke" or patches 
to fix it.  Sir, I have been here for YEARS.  And I have NO intention to 
say anything which might be taken as detrimental or negative here.  I 
said have - I meant had, eh?

Mea culpa.
b-