From: Graeme Russ <graeme.russ@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] 'Relocation' for sc520 (i386) based boards
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 18:08:24 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48D600F8.9080801@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi All,
I've been thinking about where U-Boot runs in memory on my sc520
based board and it appears that it is always executing from ROM and
I started pondering if I should attempt to relocate U-Boot into RAM.
Note: Please correct me if I am mistaken and U-Boot does indeed run
from RAM on i386 / sc520
This, of course, would give me the benefit of having unfettered access
to the flash that U-Boot is located on for things like environment
storage, upgrade in place etc.
My thought is to not actually 'Relocate' U-Boot but to use a very
handy feature of the sc520 - The ability to map the BOOTCS (Boot ROM
Chip Select) to anywhere in memory using a PAR (Programmable Address
Region).
Currently, BOOTCS is mapped from 0x38000000. My board has 512k Boot
Flash, so the BOOTCS PAR is 0x38000000 - 0x3807ffff. With U-Boot in
the upper 256k (puts the reset vector at fff0 for cpu startup), this
puts u-boot code at 0x38040000 (TEXT_BASE in config.mk).
The SDRAM for my board is 128MB starting at 0x00000000 (ending at
0x08000000)
My thought is to change TEXT_BASE to 0x08040000, keep BOOTCS at
0x38000000, copy 0x38040000 - 0x3807ffff to 0x08040000 - 0x0807ffff
as soon as I enter protected mode (and have access to all memory) and
have set up the SDRAM controller etc, then jump directly to the copy
in RAM. I would then have two copies of u-boot in memory - One in RAM
at 0x08040000 and one in ROM at 0x38040000.
One problem I can think of is that the linker will point all the jump
labels into RAM - not an issue for the 16-bit code which uses relative
jumps, but I think I may run into issues during the real to protected
mode transition (far jump) which, by definition, has to happen before
I get access to the full memory space. How do I tell the linker that
these jumps should target 0x38040000+ and not 0x08040000+ ?
Does all this sound logical? viable? sensible? practical?
Regards,
Graeme
next reply other threads:[~2008-09-21 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-21 8:08 Graeme Russ [this message]
2008-09-21 17:29 ` [U-Boot] 'Relocation' for sc520 (i386) based boards Jerry Van Baren
2008-09-21 23:18 ` Graeme Russ
2008-09-22 12:51 ` Graeme Russ
2008-09-22 12:52 ` Graeme Russ
2008-09-22 12:57 ` Graeme Russ
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-09-23 6:58 yusuf khan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48D600F8.9080801@gmail.com \
--to=graeme.russ@gmail.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.