All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@hp.com>
Cc: kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Extending MTRRs above 4G
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 12:18:36 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48D8B46C.6030005@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1221673872.16470.27.camel@lappy>

Alex Williamson wrote:
> When I try to boot guests using a recent Linux kernel (2.6.26+), memory
> above 3.5G gets thrown away with an error like this:
>
> WARNING: BIOS bug: CPU MTRRs don't cover all of memory, losing 4608MB of RAM.
>
> And it's true, we're only providing MTRRs for memory below 4G.  In fact
> rombios32 knows very little, if anything, about memory above 4G, as seen
> by memory reporting in the SMBIOS table.
>
> It looks like the Linux kernel MTRR code does have a bail-out point for
> kvm/qemu, but that was only effective before we started reporting MTRRs.
> On real hardware, I have two systems that do this two different ways.
> The first is an Intel based system, which reports MTRRs to cover the I/O
> space, then defaults the rest of memory to WB.  The second is an AMD
> based system which uses MTRRs to cover memory below 4G, then seems to
> have a special AMD MSR to describe the top of memory above 4G.  Xen
> appears to mimic the first approach.
>
> Is there any reason that KVM sets the default MTRR type to UC, then only
> sets up MTRRs for the memory below 4G?

The thinking is that if we hotplug a device, its memory must be set to 
uncacheable by default.

>   the patch below is a possible
> approach to continue down this path and enlighten rombios32 about the
> real top of memory, and setup MTRRs appropriately.  It doesn't address
> SMBIOS or whatever causes grub to only report upper memory below 4G.
> Alternatively we could switch to the Intel/Xen system approach, but it
> seems rombios32 needs to understand the extra memory at some point
> anyway.  Thoughts?  BTW, another benefit to the default WB approach is
> that MTRRs are a limited resource and there will be memory sizes we
> can't fully cover using the approach below.  

Yes, especially with the pci hole causing any memory size to require 
many MTRRs.

I'd like to switch to default WB + MTRRs covering the pci space, but I'd 
like to get a clear understanding of how we handle hotplug.  Meanwhile, 
I've applied your patch.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


      parent reply	other threads:[~2008-09-23  9:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-17 17:51 [RFC] Extending MTRRs above 4G Alex Williamson
2008-09-17 19:47 ` Philip Herron
2008-09-17 21:05 ` Alex Williamson
2008-09-23  9:19   ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-23  9:18 ` Avi Kivity [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48D8B46C.6030005@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@hp.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.