From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <48D90034.1070602@domain.hid> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:41:56 +0200 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <48D8FEE6.3090109@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <48D8FEE6.3090109@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Adeos-main] [BUG] vmalloc_sync_one complains about __ipipe_pin_range_globally Reply-To: gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org List-Id: General discussion about Adeos List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: adeos-main , Philippe Gerum Jan Kiszka wrote: > Hi, > > any thoughts on this BUG? Happens with ipipe-2.0-07 on 2.6.24.7, > obviously during module loading. > > kernel BUG at arch/x86/mm/fault_64.c:258! > invalid opcode: 0000 [1] SMP > CPU 3 > Modules linked in: ide_core ide_disk scsi_mod sd_mod serverworks libata > sata_svw scsi_transport_sas mptbase mptscsih mptsas sg fan edd > pata_serverworks jbd mbcache ext3 usbcore hwmon i2c_core k8temp > pci_hotplug i2c_piix4 shpchp ehci_hcd ohci_hcd rtc_lib rtc_core rtc_cmos > tg3 > Pid: 1683, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.24.7-xeno #1 > RIP: 0010:[] [] > vmalloc_sync_one+0x6f/0x197 > RSP: 0018:ffff81023b0c1c98 EFLAGS: 00010287 > RAX: 00003ffffffff000 RBX: ffff81023feeea88 RCX: ffff810000000000 > RDX: ffff81023c423000 RSI: 000000023c423000 RDI: ffff81023b1e7c20 > RBP: ffff81023b0c1cc8 R08: ffffffff80201c20 R09: 0000000000000800 > R10: ffffffff8099a380 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 0000000000000c20 > R13: ffffc20001888000 R14: ffffc20001888000 R15: 0000000000000000 > FS: 00002ac2367716d0(0000) GS:ffff81023c31d5c0(0000) > knlGS:0000000000000000 > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b > CR2: 00002ac236442000 CR3: 000000023b139000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > Process modprobe (pid: 1683, threadinfo ffff81023b0c0000, task > ffff81023c3ba7f0) > Stack: ffffc2000188bfff ffff81023feeea88 0000000000000c20 > ffffc20001888000 > ffffc2000188c000 0000000000000000 ffff81023b0c1d08 ffffffff802252ac > ffffc2000188c000 0000000000000000 ffffc2000188c000 ffff81013a1cf468 > Call Trace: > [] __ipipe_pin_range_globally+0x9a/0xe4 > [] map_vm_area+0x29f/0x2b0 > [] __vmalloc_area_node+0x173/0x199 > [] __vmalloc_node+0x5d/0x6a > [] __vmalloc+0x11/0x13 > [] vmalloc+0x1d/0x1f > [] sys_init_module+0x71/0x18ba > [] mcount+0x4c/0x72 > [] mcount+0x4c/0x72 > [] __ipipe_syscall_root+0xc/0x197 > [] __ipipe_syscall_root_thunk+0x35/0x6a > [] system_call+0x92/0x97 > > > Code: 0f 0b eb fe 49 8b 00 4c 89 f2 49 bf 00 f0 ff ff ff 3f 00 00 > RIP [] vmalloc_sync_one+0x6f/0x197 > RSP > > > The relevant code in fault_64.c: > > static int vmalloc_sync_one(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long address) > { > pgd_t *pgd_ref; > pud_t *pud, *pud_ref; > pmd_t *pmd, *pmd_ref; > pte_t *pte, *pte_ref; > > /* Copy kernel mappings over when needed. This can also > happen within a race in page table update. In the later > case just flush. */ > > pgd_ref = pgd_offset_k(address); > if (pgd_none(*pgd_ref)) > return -1; > if (pgd_none(*pgd)) > set_pgd(pgd, *pgd_ref); > else > BUG_ON(pgd_page_vaddr(*pgd) != pgd_page_vaddr(*pgd_ref)); > > This one triggers. I think there is something missing in the I-pipe patch: when a vmalloc occurs we update all page directories, but when a vfree occurs, we do nothing. Is there any chance that the bug you observed is in fact a vmalloc which reuses an address which has been vfreed recently ? -- Gilles.