From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 25 Sep 2008 10:54:25 +0100 (BST) Received: from h155.mvista.com ([63.81.120.155]:36932 "EHLO imap.sh.mvista.com") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S30611410AbYIYJyS (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Sep 2008 10:54:18 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [10.150.0.9]) by imap.sh.mvista.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF7A3ED0; Thu, 25 Sep 2008 02:54:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48DB5FC0.2060908@ru.mvista.com> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:54:08 +0400 From: Sergei Shtylyov User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "John W. Linville" Cc: Aurelien Jarno , Ralf Baechle , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Michael Buesch Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] [MIPS] BCM47xx: Add platform specific PCI code References: <20080924191840.GA18700@volta.aurel32.net> <20080924191955.GB18700@volta.aurel32.net> <48DABBBE.7060201@ru.mvista.com> <20080925001433.GA3496@tuxdriver.com> In-Reply-To: <20080925001433.GA3496@tuxdriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 20627 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Hello. John W. Linville wrote: >>> This patch, ported from OpenWRT SVN, defines pcibios_map_irq() and >>> pcibios_plat_dev_init() for the BCM47xx platform. >>> >>> It fixes the regression introduced by commit >>> aab547ce0d1493d400b6468c521a0137cd8c1edf. >>> > > Did you read this part? > I usually comment on the patches regardless of such stuff. Maybe I shoudn't have this time in order to not take the blame for the patch bot being merged... >>> + if (err) { >>> + printk(KERN_ALERT "PCI: Failed to init device %s\n", >>> + pci_name(dev)); >>> + } >>> >>> >> Unneeded {}... >> > > This is petty bullshit... > No, just style nitpicking. :-) > Is there a real reason why this hasn't been merged? > This question is not to me. > John > WBR, Sergei