From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@novell.com>
To: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
Cc: James Smart <James.Smart@Emulex.Com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi : set target can_queue from devinfo flags
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:46:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48DC9367.6050402@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48DBD53E.4040604@cs.wisc.edu>
Hi Mike,
Mike Christie wrote:
> James Smart wrote:
>> This sounds reasonable, but I wouldn't eliminate this can_queue limit.
>
> I was not going to elimitate it. It is all muddled in the one mail, so
> it is confusing.
>
> I was just going to set it based on target vendor info table in
> userspace from a scsi daemon that was going to handle this issue and
> handle ramp ups due to QUEUE_FULL ramp downs and other scsi issues like
> the handling of sense that indicates disks changes size or report lun
> data changes.
>
> Hannes had mentioned he was making some event infrastructure to handle
> the sense, and I thought I could extend his userspce code to handle the
> ramp up issue and handle setting this value. So for just the
> starget->can_queue issue, the daemon would listen for target hotplug
> events, then it would do sg io to device on it and get the vendor info
> and look up the target in a table and then if found would write to a
> starget->can_queue sysfs file to set the value.
>
Currently I've implemented another scsi netlink event, which just
transports the sense code to the outside world. Next step will be
a daemon which listens to the SCSI netlink events and reacts upon
that; will work largely along the lines udev does.
So we'll be getting a sysfs patch for the device, the message class,
and some payload for the message.
Configuration will quite simple, probably just something like:
[message class]
[payload regex] [command]
[payload regex] [command]
etc.
I'll probably implementing some pre-defined commands like rescan,
but will also add a simple callout for executing commands directly.
> The same daemon could also handle the sense handling and handle other
> errors like when to ramp up from when we ramp down due to QUEUE_FULLs.
> So it is basically a scsi-ml/lib in userpsace that could be easily
> packaged for distros to carry.
Quite easily. Actually, that was the point of that program.
Cheers,
Hannes
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-26 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-13 17:45 [PATCH] scsi : set target can_queue from devinfo flags James Smart
2008-05-14 6:34 ` Hannes Reinecke
2008-05-14 14:39 ` James Smart
2008-05-14 15:01 ` Hannes Reinecke
2008-05-14 19:38 ` James Bottomley
2008-05-14 21:50 ` James Smart
2008-05-15 1:21 ` James Smart
2008-09-24 19:13 ` Mike Christie
2008-09-24 19:17 ` Mike Christie
2008-09-25 18:40 ` Mike Christie
2008-09-25 19:03 ` James Smart
2008-09-24 19:38 ` James Smart
2008-09-25 18:15 ` Mike Christie
2008-09-26 7:46 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48DC9367.6050402@novell.com \
--to=hare@novell.com \
--cc=James.Smart@Emulex.Com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.