From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753209AbYI0MuX (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Sep 2008 08:50:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752191AbYI0MuL (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Sep 2008 08:50:11 -0400 Received: from hawking.rebel.net.au ([203.20.69.83]:37378 "EHLO hawking.rebel.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752439AbYI0MuK (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Sep 2008 08:50:10 -0400 Message-ID: <48DE2BF7.3060905@davidnewall.com> Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 22:19:59 +0930 From: David Newall User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vegard Nossum CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Swap on loop device on tmpfs locks up machine References: <19f34abd0809261146j72a68765i964466336a3a34dc@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <19f34abd0809261146j72a68765i964466336a3a34dc@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Vegard Nossum wrote: > It turns out that swap over loop device on tmpfs will lock up the > machine. Doesn't tmpfs use otherwise-free virtual memory? I expect the machine would lock up if you put swap (i.e. additional virtual memory) on such a device.