All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ky Srinivasan" <ksrinivasan@novell.com>
To: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@citrix.com>,
	Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] SupportingEnlightenedWindows2008Server
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 12:43:49 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48DF40A6.E57C.0030.0@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C42166D1.16177%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>



>>> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at  1:15 PM, in message
<C42166D1.16177%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>, Keir Fraser
<keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> wrote: 
> On 8/4/08 18:03, "Ky Srinivasan" <ksrinivasan@novell.com> wrote:
> 
>> From a performance point of view, I think the MSR access to APIC registers 
> are
>> the most important. As far as hypercalls go, the only one currently
>> implemented is the hypercall to change the page table base.  Some of the 
> other
>> synthetic MSRs support features that the current windows 2008 server 
> currently
>> is not using (timeouts for example).
> 
> That's a bit surprising since w2k8 probably accesses the TPR via %cr8, for
> which we implement vmexit mitigation. The only other APIC register that is
> often accessed is EOI. We can't avoid the vmexit for that, and the extra
> cost of not having an explicit MSR for it is a run through the mmio
> emulator. I'd be surprised if avoiding the run through the emulator per
> interrupt was that much of a win.
> 
> Anyhow, you should be able to switch off HyperV features selectively, as
> advertised to the domU HVM guest, and see which ones make a difference to
> performance.

The benchmark was run a while ago on some very early sles10 sp2 bits (late last fall/winter). It is by selectively enabling HyperV functionality that I concluded that APIC MSR access was the most important enlightenment based on NetBench results. We are in the process of running a range of benchmarks. I will keep you posted.

Regards,

K. Y
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-13 18:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <48ABEA14.E57C.0030.0@novell.com>
2008-04-08 17:15 ` [PATCH][RFC] Supporting EnlightenedWindows2008Server Keir Fraser
2008-04-13 18:43   ` Ky Srinivasan [this message]
2008-04-13 19:05 [PATCH][RFC] SupportingEnlightenedWindows2008Server Ky Srinivasan
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-04-13 20:08 Ky Srinivasan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48DF40A6.E57C.0030.0@novell.com \
    --to=ksrinivasan@novell.com \
    --cc=Tim.Deegan@citrix.com \
    --cc=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.